June 2002
Volume 43, Issue 6
Free
Retina  |   June 2002
Phenotypic Spectrum of Autosomal Recessive Cone–Rod Dystrophies Caused by Mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) Gene
Author Affiliations
  • B. Jeroen Klevering
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology and
  • Anita Blankenagel
    University Eye Clinic, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Alessandra Maugeri
    Human Genetics, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and the
  • Frans P. M. Cremers
    Human Genetics, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and the
  • Carel B. Hoyng
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology and
  • Klaus Rohrschneider
    University Eye Clinic, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2002, Vol.43, 1980-1985. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. Jeroen Klevering, Anita Blankenagel, Alessandra Maugeri, Frans P. M. Cremers, Carel B. Hoyng, Klaus Rohrschneider; Phenotypic Spectrum of Autosomal Recessive Cone–Rod Dystrophies Caused by Mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) Gene. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(6):1980-1985.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. To describe the phenotype of 12 patients with autosomal recessive or isolated cone–rod types of progressive retinal degeneration (CRD) caused by mutations in the ABCA4 gene.

methods. The charts of patients who had originally received a diagnosis of isolated or autosomal recessive CRD were reviewed after molecular analysis revealed mutations in the ABCA4 gene.

results. In two of the patients both the photopic and scotopic electroretinogram were nonrecordable. In the remainder, the photopic cone b-wave amplitudes appeared to be more seriously affected than the scotopic rod b-wave amplitudes. Although the clinical presentation was heterogeneous, all patients experienced visual loss early in life, impaired color vision, and a central scotoma. Fundoscopy revealed evidence of early-onset maculopathy, sometimes accompanied by involvement of the retinal periphery in the later stages of the disease.

conclusions. Mutations in the ABCA4 gene are the pathologic cause of the CRD-like dystrophy in these patients, and the resultant clinical pictures are complex and heterogeneous. Given this wide clinical spectrum of CRD-like phenotypes associated with ABCA4 mutations, detailed clinical subclassifications are difficult and may not be very useful.

Most present classifications of retinal dystrophies are based on whether the disease is progressive or stationary and whether the retinal disease is generalized or located predominantly in the macula. Generalized retinal dystrophies are further divided according to which type of photoreceptor is mainly affected in the early stages and most severely throughout the course of the disease. Additional findings such as yellow-white fundus flecks and a dark choroid on fluorescein angiography, as in Stargardt disease (STGD), are attributed to specific retinal disorders. 
Although there are several definitions of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), “typical” RP is considered to demonstrate rod–cone patterns of retinal degeneration on the electroretinogram (ERG). 1 2 Patients with typical RP demonstrate progressive loss of night and peripheral vision and show ophthalmoscopic features such as attenuated retinal vessels, bone spicula in the retinal midperiphery and a waxy paleness of the optic disc. Conversely, a group of patients with a progressive retinal disorder shows cone–rod patterns on ERG testing. These retinal dystrophies, commonly described as cone–rod dystrophies (CRDs), form a clinically heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by most of the following features: early loss of visual acuity, deficits in color vision, progressive impairment of the visual field, and, sometimes, nystagmus. In time, pigmentary changes become apparent in the macular area, often followed by variable degrees of midperipheral pigmentation. The ERG is abnormal with either cone (photopic) responses more reduced than rod (scotopic) responses, or equally reduced cone and rod systems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  
Mutations in the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette transporter (ABCA4) gene are responsible for a spectrum of retinal dystrophies including STGD, autosomal recessive CRD and autosomal recessive RP. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ABCA4 is located in the disc membrane of the rod outer segments, and it was demonstrated recently by Kelsell et al. 16 and Sun and Nathans 17 that the ABCA4 gene is also expressed in retinal cones. In the present study we describe a group of patients with autosomal recessive or isolated CRD caused by mutations in the ABCA4 gene. 
Patients and Methods
The protocol of the study adhered to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. After informed consent was obtained, blood samples were taken and molecular analysis on the ABCA4 gene was performed as described by Maugeri et al. 14 The charts of patients with ABCA4 mutations who originally had received diagnoses of isolated or autosomal recessive CRD were reviewed. All patients originated from the University Medical Centre Nijmegen (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and the University of Heidelberg (Heidelberg, Germany). In this study the diagnosis of CRD was based on the following criteria: initial symptoms of blurred central vision without a history of night blindness, impairment of color vision, and fundoscopic evidence of maculopathy without or with mild peripheral retinopathy. 3 4 5 7 8 In patients with recordable ERGs a cone–rod pattern of degeneration had to be present (i.e., the photopic b-wave impairment had to be greater than or equal to the scotopic b-wave amplitude impairment). Patients 9250 and 13163, who had nonrecordable ERGs, were included because their histories and clinical features were similar to those of other patients with cone–rod degeneration and they were believed to represent advanced cases of CRD. In addition to an ophthalmic examination, Goldmann kinetic perimetry routinely was performed using III-4-e and I-4-e isopters. Color vision was tested with the Ishihara and Panel D15 tests, except in patients 9369, 9378, and 10125, who were tested under conditions described earlier. 18 Because these patients were examined in two different clinics and ERGs were recorded over a long period, the methods, instrumentation, and analysis techniques of the electroretinography varied. The ERGs in patients 9369, 9378, 10125, and 11872 were performed as described by Thijssen et al. 19 The ERG method used in patients 9370, 9553, 9633, and 13163 was described by Alexandridis and Krastel. 20 The ERGs of the remaining patients (9250, 9371, and 9650) are of a more recent date and were performed according to International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standards. 21 Fundus photographs were taken in most patients and some of the patients (9650, 9369, 9378, and 10125) also underwent fluorescein angiography. 
Results
The characteristics of 12 patients with ABCA4-associated retinal dystrophy resembling CRD are summarized in Table 1 . Most did not have affected family members, and therefore their retinal dystrophies could not be classified as autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked. Four patients reported a brother or sister with subnormal vision. In view of the reputedly normal visual acuity of the parents and the molecular defects, the inheritance pattern of the gene defects in these patients (individuals 9303, 9369, 9553, and 13163) was classified as autosomal recessive. 
The visual acuity of the patients did not exceed 20/200 and, on average, was much lower. With the exception of patient 9553, the age of onset was at or before the age of 12, and in each of the patients, blurred vision was the initial symptom. Night blindness did not occur except in patients 9378 and 10125, in the final stages of retinal degeneration. Evidence of maculopathy in the form of bull’s eye maculopathy or pigmentary changes was present in all the patients reported in this study (Fig. 1A) . The functional equivalent of the mainly centrally located retinal disease was a central scotoma, varying from 8° to more than 40°. In all but one patient, the scotoma was absolute. Only in patient 9378 was the central scotoma relative and surrounded by absolute scotomas. Fundoscopic evidence of early peripheral involvement of the retina was mild, and only in the later stages of the disease did peripheral changes characteristic of RP, such as narrowing of retinal vessels and bone spicula, occur in patients 9369 (Fig. 1B) and 10125. Similarly, mild constriction of the visual fields occurred only in two patients (9650 and 10125) and only in the advanced state. Color vision was tested in 10 patients. Six demonstrated a red–green defect, and in two of these (patients 11872 and 10125), it was accompanied by a blue-yellow defect. In the remaining four patients, color vision was so severely disturbed that the exact type of impairment could not be assessed. 
The ERG recordings demonstrated degeneration of both rods and cones. When ERG responses could be elicited, the cones appeared to be affected as much as the rod photoreceptors and, in most of the patients, even more severely. The ERG responses in five patients progressively deteriorated until no photopic and scotopic responses could be recorded. In these patients, with exception of patients 9250 and 13163, ERG recordings of an earlier date were used in Table 1 . This applies to patient 9369, in whom an ERG was recorded at age 12 (all ERG responses had been nondetectable since the age of 21), patient 9378 at age 33 (all ERG responses at age 46 were nondetectable), and patient 10125 at age 8 (in 1998, at age 28, the ERG responses were no longer detectable). Recent ERG findings were not available for patients 9650 and 9371. Their ERGs were recorded in 1989 and 1985, respectively. The remaining ERG data were derived from ERG recordings performed in the past 4 years. Of patient 9371 only the ERG data in the left eye were available. 
Two patients warrant a more detailed description, due to the unusual course of their retinal dystrophies. Patient 9378, at the age of 12, had blurred vision with fundoscopic evidence of irregular chorioretinal atrophy in the posterior pole. At that time, there were no peripheral abnormalities on ophthalmoscopy, and there was no history of night blindness. The ERG demonstrated an equal reduction of both cone- and rod-mediated responses. Later in life, however, fundoscopic changes developed that were characteristic of RP, and the patient reported a decrease in night vision. With fluorescein angiography partly confluent patches of chorioretinal atrophy were visible (Fig. 1C)
The clinical picture of patient 10125 differed from that of the other patients, despite the mutation in the ABCA4 gene. Initially, disease in this patient was diagnosed as STGD because of the bull’s eye maculopathy, the granular pigment alterations in the macular area, and the pisciform flecks surrounding the posterior pole. At age 8 his visual acuity had decreased to 20/200 in both eyes. When he was referred to our clinic in 1998 at the age of 28, peripheral degeneration in the form of narrow retinal vessels and deposition of peripheral bone spicula had developed, in addition to the earlier described disease of the central retina. A fluorescein angiogram showed typical findings: a central small hypofluorescent spot enclosed by an ellipsoid—a markedly hyperfluorescent area that in turn was surrounded by hyperfluorescent dots against a dark background, most likely caused by obscuration of choroidal background fluorescence (Fig. 1D) . Early ERG recordings were not available, and the ERG tracings recorded at age 28 represent the final stage of the degenerative process, with absence of both cone and rod responses. This retinal dystrophy seemed to have evolved from STGD into more widespread retinal degeneration, resulting in loss of function of both rods and cones. 
Discussion
Progressive CRD is a clinically heterogeneous retinal disorder, but typical findings include reduced visual acuity, impairment of the central visual field, color vision deficits, and fundoscopic evidence of maculopathy, with no or few midperipheral retinal pigment deposits. 3 4 7 8 There is some dispute about typical ERG findings in CRD. Some state that the diagnosis of CRD must be based on the reduction or absence of cone responses in the presence of quantitatively less reduction in rod responses, whereas others state that an equal impairment of both photoreceptor systems, if accompanied by the characteristic features, suffices to justify the diagnosis of CRD. 3 7 8 22 Several propositions have been made in the past to classify cone–rod disorders. Some classification systems have focused on individual case reports and were based on nosologic aspects; others have made a distinction according to the various patterns of inheritance. 3 6 23 24 In recent studies, Szlyk et al. 7 and Yagasaki et al. 8 made use of full-field ERGs, dark adaptometry, and modified perimetric techniques to identify functionally distinct subtypes of CRD. Finally, over the past few years, a molecular genetic classification of CRD has emerged. 
At the moment, four genes and three loci have been implicated in autosomal dominant CRD, whereas one X-linked locus has been described. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Thus far, two loci and one gene (ABCA4) have been associated with autosomal recessive CRD. 12 33 34 The genetic heterogeneity seen in CRD is matched by the range of the clinical findings attributed by various investigators to this type of retinal dystrophy. 
Whatever the classification system used, some patients display retinal disorders that cannot be classified satisfactorily. Often, these retinal degenerations involve overlapping features. Krill et al. 5 reported that 9 of 45 patients with cone degenerations showed typical features associated with fundus flavimaculatus. Heckenlively 2 described 76 patients with cone–rod patterns on the ERG in whom retinal disease otherwise met the standard definition of RP (progressive peripheral visual field loss with ring scotoma). Alternatively, as seen in patient 10125 in this study, patients with STGD have been described who had progressive peripheral retinal degeneration with severe abnormalities in the ERG and electro-oculogram (EOG) later in life—a condition that has been described by Fishman 4 as secondary progressive cone–rod dysfunction. 
The association of CRD and a dark choroid has also been described previously. 35 36 The atypical pattern of retinal degeneration with confluent patches of chorioretinal atrophy in patient 9378 resembles that in another previously described unrelated patient with CRD-like disease caused by mutations in ABCA4. 37 In the molecular genetic study by Maugeri et al., 14 in which 11 of the 12 patients with autosomal recessive CRD described in this study were analyzed, ABCA4 mutations were found in 13 of 20 unrelated patients, strongly suggesting that ABCA4 mutations are the major cause of this disorder. If this is true, the genetic heterogeneity in autosomal recessive CRD, compared with, for example, classic RP, is surprisingly low. Because autosomal recessive inheritance is believed to be the most frequent mode of inheritance of monogenic chorioretinal disorders, it is very possible that a large fraction of the patients with CRD who have been clinically studied previously carry ABCA4 mutations. In that case, the explanation for the high variability of the clinical findings in autosomal recessive CRD would not be genetic heterogeneity but rather the genotype–phenotype model for ABCA4. According to this model, there is an inverse relationship between the presumed residual ABCA4 function as an N-retinylidene-PE flippase and the severity of the disorder. 12 37 38 As a consequence, a continuum of phenotypes is to be expected, ranging from STGD to CRD to RP. Although this is probably a simplified representation of reality and needs corroboration by detailed biochemical studies of individual mutations, as described previously, this model explains why mutations in the ABCA4 gene could give rise to phenotypes that do not satisfy the standard classification of retinal dystrophies. 39  
Two patients in this study may reflect borderline CRD phenotypes. Patient 9553 carries a combination of a mild (2588G>C) and severe ABCA4 mutation, which, according to the genotype–phenotype model described earlier, should be associated with STGD. We have previously discussed that most likely, one of the pathologic mutations has not yet been identified in this patient. 14 However, the age of onset in this patient (25 years) is relatively high, and although other features such as visual acuity, perimetry, and ERG findings are typical of CRD, this may indicate a relatively mild subtype. Another more convincing example of blending of ABCA4-associated phenotypes is patient 10125. The molecular findings in this patient have not yet been described elsewhere. He carries a severe splice site mutation (IVS30+1G→T) in combination with a nucleotide change leading to a stop codon at Gln1029. A patient with RP who was homozygous for the IVS30+1G→T mutation has been described, 12 whereas the Q1029X mutation has not been described. Both mutations can be considered to be null alleles. According to the proposed ABCA4 model, the clinical phenotype in patient 10125 should be RP. Instead, this patient exhibits a typical retinal dystrophy, which gradually progresses from STGD to a more widespread degeneration of photoreceptors in a cone–rod pattern later in life. At present, both rod and cone ERG responses are not detectable, indicative of a final stage similar to that in many patients with RP. Functional studies are necessary to clarify whether these specific ABCA4 mutations are responsible for the particular progression of the retinal degeneration in this patient, or whether other as yet unknown modifying factors play a role. 
In this study we have described 12 unrelated patients with retinal dystrophy resembling CRD caused by mutations in the ABCA4 gene. In a previous study we described the ophthalmic features in five siblings with CRD-like retinal dystrophy who were carrying ABCA4 mutations. 37 From the clinical data of these patients and previous molecular studies in patients with autosomal recessive CRD, two important conclusions can be drawn. 12 14 First, the genetic basis of autosomal recessive CRD is less heterogeneous than was thought, based on the variability in clinical features, because mutations in the ABCA4 gene seems to be the major pathologic cause. Second, given the wide clinical spectrum of CRD-like phenotypes associated with ABCA4 mutations, detailed clinical subclassifications are difficult and may not be very useful. 
Table 1.
 
Patients with Cone–Rod Degeneration and ABCA4 Mutations
Table 1.
 
Patients with Cone–Rod Degeneration and ABCA4 Mutations
Patient Sex Current Age (ys) ABCA4 Mutations* Visual Acuity Age of Onset (ys) Fundoscopy Color Vision Perimetry ERG Cone (μV), † ERG Rod (μV), †
OD OS OD OS OD OS
9250 M 30 1622T→C; 3113C→T 194G→A CF CF 6 Pigment clumping in the macula NP Large central scotoma over 40° ND, ‡ ND, ‡
9303 M 21 1622T→C; 3113C→T 20/400 20/400 7 Granular pigmentary changes in the macula Diffusely disturbed Central scotoma of 20° Severely decreased, § Severely decreased, §
9369 F 40 6601-6602deIAG LP LP 8 Irregular hypopigmentation, mainly in the posterior pole. In later stages: attenuated vessels and bone spicula temporal to the macula Red-green defect Central scotoma varying from 10–30° 65 (65%) 80 (80%), ∥ 140 (90%) 160 (nl), ∥
9370 M 15 1622T→C; 3113C→T 20/200 20/200 7 Granular aspect of the macula NP Concentric central scotoma of 8° 10 (13%) 9 (13%), ¶ 29 (29%) 29 (23%), ¶
9371 M 38 1622T→C; 3113C→T 1622T→C;3113C→T 20/400 20/400 10 Bull’s eye maculopathy Red-green defect Concentric central scotoma of 20° NP 29 (16%), ‡ NP 54 (30%), ‡
9378 F 50 768G→T CF CF 12 Bull’s eye maculopathy, narrow vessels in periphery with mild granular changes of the pigment epithelium and confluent patches of chorioretinal atrophy Severely disturbed Large, absolute, paracentral scotomas, relative scotoma centrally 20 (20%) 30 (30%), ∥ 70 (47%) 90 (60%), ∥
9553 F 45 2588G→C IVS35del-2→+2del4 20/400 20/400 25 Bull’s eye maculopathy. Peripheral diffuse motting of RPE Severely disturbed Large central scotoma over 40° 14 (14%) 19 (19%), ¶ 41 (41%) 24 (24%), ¶
9633 M 22 1622T→C; 3113C→T 4469G→A 20/400 20/200 12 Atrophy of retinal pigment epithelium in posterior pole. Early stages of bull’s eye maculopathy Red-green defect Central scotoma of 20° 12 (16%) 12 (16%), ¶ 61 (62%) 39 (39%), ¶
9650 F 20 3364G→A 20/400 20/400 5 Central granular aspect Red-green defect Large central scotoma of 30° and relative constriction of III-4 70 (39%) 106 (59%), ‡ 272 (nl) 115 (76%), ‡
10125 M 30 IVS30+1G→T 3085C→T 20/200 20/200 8 Central hypopigmentation with dark surrounding, resembling bull’s eye. Later in life: peripheral changes characteristic of RP Severe red-green defect; mild blue-yellow defect Central scotoma of 10–15° with mild peripheral restriction 75 (75%) 80 (80%), ∥ 130 (87%) 140 (93%), ∥
11872 M 30 634C→T 20/200 20/200 10 Bull’s eye pattern Severely disturbed; blue-yellow more than red-green Central scotoma of 25° 23 (23%) 35 (35%), ∥ 110 (73%) 95 (63%), ∥
13163 M 15 1622T→C;3113C→T IVS36+1G→A 20/400 20/200 6 Granular aspect of retinal pigment epithelium in macula. Slightly pale optic disc Severely disturbed Central scotoma of 10–15,° no peripheral involvement ND, ¶ ND, ¶
Figure 1.
 
(AD) Fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms in eyes of patients with (atypical) CRD. (A) Patient 11872 with bull’s eye maculopathy. (B) Patient 9369, demonstrating CRD in the later stages with attenuation of the retinal arterioles and irregular pigmentation temporal to the macula. (C) Fluorescein angiograms in patient 9378 showing confluent patches of chorioretinal atrophy. (D) Patient 10125 with central hypofluorescence enclosed by an ellipsoid hyperfluorescent area. In the surrounding area, hyperfluorescent flecks are visible, and the choroidal background fluorescence seems blocked, as seen in STGD.
Figure 1.
 
(AD) Fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms in eyes of patients with (atypical) CRD. (A) Patient 11872 with bull’s eye maculopathy. (B) Patient 9369, demonstrating CRD in the later stages with attenuation of the retinal arterioles and irregular pigmentation temporal to the macula. (C) Fluorescein angiograms in patient 9378 showing confluent patches of chorioretinal atrophy. (D) Patient 10125 with central hypofluorescence enclosed by an ellipsoid hyperfluorescent area. In the surrounding area, hyperfluorescent flecks are visible, and the choroidal background fluorescence seems blocked, as seen in STGD.
 
. Retinitis pigmentosa: a symposium on terminology and methods of examination. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:126–131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Heckenlively JR. RP cone-rod degeneration. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1987;85:438–470. [PubMed]
Berson EL, Gouras P, Gunkel RD. Progressive cone-rod degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;80:68–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fishman GA. Progressive human cone-rod dysfunction (dystrophy). Symp Eye Disease. 1976;81:716–724.
Krill AE, Deutman AF, Fishman M. The cone degenerations. Doc Ophthalmol. 1973;35:1–80. [PubMed]
Ripps H, Noble KG, Greenstein VC, Siegel IM, Carr RE. Progressive cone dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1401–1409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Peachey NS, Derlacki DJ. Clinical subtypes of cone-rod dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:781–788. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yagasaki K, Jacobson SG. Cone-rod dystrophy: phenotypic diversity by retinal function testing. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:701–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Allikmets R, Singh N, Sun H, et al. A photoreceptor cell-specific ATP-binding transporter gene (ABCR) is mutated in recessive Stargardt macular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1997;15:236–246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Allikmets R, Wasserman WW, Hutchinson A, et al. Organization of the ABCR gene: analysis of promoter and splice junction sequences. Gene. 1998;215:111–122. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Azarian SM, Travis GH. The photoreceptor rim protein is an ABC transporter encoded by the gene for recessive Stargardt’s disease (ABCR). FEBS Lett. 1997;409:247–252. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cremers FPM, van de Pol DJ, van Driel M, et al. Autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy caused by splice site mutations in the Stargardt’s disease gene ABCR. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:355–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Martinez MA, Paloma E, Allikmets R, et al. Retinitis pigmentosa caused by a homozygous mutation in the Stargardt disease gene ABCR. Nat Genet. 1998;18:11–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maugeri A, Klevering BJ, Rohrschneider K., et al. Mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene are the major cause of autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:960–966. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rozet JM, Gerber S, Ghazi I, et al. Mutations of the retinal specific ATP binding transporter gene (ABCR) in a single family segregating both autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa RP19 and Stargardt disease: evidence of clinical heterogeneity at this locus. J Med Genet. 1999;36:447–451. [PubMed]
Kelsell RE, Gregory EK, Payne AM, et al. Mutations in the retinal guanylate cyclase (RETGC-1) gene in dominant cone-rod dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1179–1184. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sun H, Nathans J. Stargardt’s ABCR is localized to the disc membrane of retinal rod outer segments. Nat Genet. 1997;17:15–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pinckers A. Color vision and age. Ophthalmologica. 1980;181:23–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thijssen JM, Pinckers A, Otto AJ. A multipurpose optical system for ophthalmic electrodiagnosis. Ophthalmologica. 1974;168:308–314. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Alexandridis E, Krastel H. Elektrodiagnostik in der Augenheilkunde. 1986; Springer New York.
Rohrschneider K, Blankenagel A, Kruse FE, Fendrich T, Volcker HE. Macular function testing in a German pedigree with North Carolina macular dystrophy. Retina. 1998;18:453–459. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Birch DG, Anderson JL, Fish GE. Yearly rates of rod and cone functional loss in retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:258–268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goodman G, Ripps H, Siegel IM. Cone dysfunction syndromes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;70:126–143.
Pagon RA. Retinitis pigmentosa. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988;33:137–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Balciuniene J, Johansson K, Sandgren O, Wachtmeister L, Holmgren G, Forsman K. A gene for autosomal dominant progressive cone dystrophy (CORD5) maps to chromosome 17p12–p13. Genomics. 1995;30:281–286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Downes SM, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, et al. Autosomal dominant cone and cone-rod dystrophy with mutations in the guanylate cyclase activator 1A gene-encoding guanylate cyclase activating protein-1. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:96–105. [PubMed]
Freund CL, Gregory-Evans CY, Furukawa T, et al. Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor. Cell. 1997;91:543–553. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kelsell RE, Gregory-Evans K, Gregory-Evans CY, et al. Localization of a gene (CORD7) for a dominant cone-rod dystrophy to chromosome 6q. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:274–279. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Klystra JA, Aylsworth AS. Cone-rod retinal dystrophy in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993;28:79–80. [PubMed]
Kobayashi A, Higashide T, Hamasaki D, et al. HRG4 (UNC119) mutation found in cone-rod dystrophy causes retinal degeneration in a transgenic model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3268–3277. [PubMed]
Payne AM, Morris AG, Downes SM, et al. Clustering and frequency of mutations in the retinal guanylate cyclase (GUCY2D) gene in patients with dominant cone-rod dystrophies. J Med Genet. 2001;38:611–614. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Seymour AB, Dash-Modi A, O’Connell JR, et al. Linkage analysis of X-linked cone-rod dystrophy: localization to Xp11.4 and definition of a locus distinct from RP2 and RP3. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:122–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Danciger M, Hendrickson J, Lyon J, et al. CORD9 a new locus for arCRD: mapping to 8p11, estimation of frequency, evaluation of a candidate gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2458–2465. [PubMed]
Khaliq S, Hameed A, Ismail M, et al. Novel locus for autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy CORD8 mapping to chromosome 1q12–Q24. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3709–3712. [PubMed]
Kniazeva MF, Chiang MF, Cutting GR, Zack DJ, Han M, Zhang K. Clinical and genetic studies of an autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy with features of Stargardt disease. Ophthalmic Genet. 1999;20:71–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leys A, Van De SW. Dark choroid in cone-rod dystrophy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1992;2:39–40. [PubMed]
Klevering BJ, van Driel M, van de Pol DJ, Pinckers AJ, Cremers FPM, Hoyng CB. Phenotypic variations in a family with retinal dystrophy as result of different mutations in the ABCR gene. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:914–918. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van Driel MA, Maugeri A, Klevering BJ, Hoyng CB, Cremers FPM. ABCR unites what ophthalmologists divide(s). Ophthalmic Genet. 1998;19:117–122. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sun H, Smallwood PM, Nathans J. Biochemical defects in ABCR protein variants associated with human retinopathies. Nat Genet. 2000;26:242–246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×