June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): Large Descemetorhexis To Reduce Rebubbling Does Not Cause Postoperative Peripheral Corneal Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Theofilos Tourtas
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Julia Wessel
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Bjoern Bachmann
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Ursula Schlotzer-Schrehardt
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Friedrich Kruse
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Theofilos Tourtas, None; Julia Wessel, None; Bjoern Bachmann, None; Ursula Schlotzer-Schrehardt, None; Friedrich Kruse, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 1672. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Theofilos Tourtas, Julia Wessel, Bjoern Bachmann, Ursula Schlotzer-Schrehardt, Friedrich Kruse; Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): Large Descemetorhexis To Reduce Rebubbling Does Not Cause Postoperative Peripheral Corneal Edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):1672.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: While DMEK renders better visual visual acuity than DSAEK, it is associated with higher rebubbling rate because of postoperative partial graft detachment. One possibility to reduce rebubbling rate is to create a larger descemetorhexis which avoids an overlap between the donor's descemet membrane and the implanted DMEK graft thus decreasing graft detachment. However, the presence of denuded stroma without descemet membrane or endothelium after large descemetorhexis might cause stromal edema. To evaluate the incidence of stromal edema in the early postoperative phase, peripheral corneal thickness was compared between patients undergoing DMEK with two different techniques.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series of 30 patients undergoing DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy with two different techniques: Based on intraoperative drawings and postoperative slit-lamp examinations patients were divided into two groups. In group A (n= 16 eyes) diameter of descemetorhexis was approx. 10 mm, resulting in a 1-mm zone of denuded stroma. In group B (n= 14 eyes) diameter was approx. 6 mm, resulting in a 1-mm zone of overlapping. To assess corneal edema, peripheral corneal thickness was measured by Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) and anterior segment OCT in the 8 mm zone within a 2-month follow-up.

Results: Preoperative peripheral corneal thickness in group A was 731 ± 63 µm and in group B 706 ± 48 µm (P=.241). Two months after surgery, peripheral corneal thickness was 702 ± 45 µm and 678 ± 48 µm in groups A and B (P=.179), respectively. Peripheral corneal thickness was not significantly different between both groups, 2 months after surgery. Rebubbling rate was 12.5% in group A and 21.4% in group B.

Conclusions: DMEK with larger descemetorhexis leaving a small zone of denuded stroma cause significantly enhanced graft adhesion without increasing the incidence of peripheral corneal edema.

Keywords: 481 cornea: endothelium • 741 transplantation  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×