June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Analysis of the binding affinity of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) to ranibizumab, aflibercept and bevacizumab
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xiangdan Wang
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
  • Jihong Yang
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Xiangdan Wang, Genentech, Inc. (E); Jihong Yang, Genentech (E), Genentech (I)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 1961. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiangdan Wang, Jihong Yang; Analysis of the binding affinity of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) to ranibizumab, aflibercept and bevacizumab. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):1961.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To evaluate affinities and kinetics of recombinant human VEGF (rhVEGF) binding to anti-VEGF therapeutics in a comprehensive Biacore study.

 
Methods
 

The binding affinities of anti-VEGF therapeutics to rhVEGF were evaluated using Biacore T200 at 37 oC. Three assay formats were used (Figure). To evaluate the 3 anti-VEGF molecules in their native conformation, rhVEGF was directly immobilized onto a sensor chip while the anti-VEGF molecules were injected at different concentrations as analytes in the liquid phase (Format 1). To minimize any potential bias on the binding that may result from rhVEGF immobilization, the anti-VEGF molecules were immobilized as ligands and different concentrations of rhVEGF were injected as analyte (Format 2). Finally the anti-VEGF molecules were indirectly captured onto a sensor chip, and rhVEGF was used as the analyte (Format 3).

 
Results
 

In the direct comparison of binding (Format 1) ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab showed average dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) values of 67, 9263, and 4456 pM, respectively. A much slower dissociation rate constant was obtained for ranibizumab than for aflibercept or bevacizumab, resulting in a higher affinity for rhVEGF by ranibizumab. This observation was consistent with data from Format 2, although the extremely slow dissociation of ranibizumab from rhVEGF, and challenges in data fitting for aflibercept precluded an accurate determination of kinetics parameters for the binding of these molecules to rhVEGF. Using Format 3, aflibercept had a KD of 1.9 pM for rhVEGF. However this format was found to be unsuitable for evaluating ranibizumab binding to rhVEGF because a significant amount of ranibizumab dissociated from the capture antibody during sample analysis.

 
Conclusions
 

In a direct comparison under uniform conditions, ranibizumab had a higher binding affinity for rhVEGF than aflibercept. The Biacore assay format profoundly affected the binding of aflibercept to VEGF and the indirect capture format was not suitable for evaluating ranibizumab binding to rhVEGF. This study highlights the importance of rigorous experimental design and careful execution of in vitro binding studies. In addition, it suggested that biological implications of the binding affinity/kinetics results need to be interpreted within broader context including potency, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy data.

  
Keywords: 688 retina • 748 vascular endothelial growth factor  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×