June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
The Prevalence of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defects in Patients with Normal Visual Fields
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alice Zhang
    Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Lan Lu
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Mohsin Ali
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Bruno Faria
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Patricia Martinez
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Liang Liang
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Huseyin Guzel
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Mike Tawfik
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • George Spaeth
    Glaucoma Research, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Alice Zhang, None; Lan Lu, None; Mohsin Ali, None; Bruno Faria, None; Patricia Martinez, None; Liang Liang, None; Huseyin Guzel, None; Mike Tawfik, None; George Spaeth, Merck (F), U.S. Patent No. 8,042,946 (P), Pfizer (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 2274. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alice Zhang, Lan Lu, Mohsin Ali, Bruno Faria, Patricia Martinez, Liang Liang, Huseyin Guzel, Mike Tawfik, George Spaeth; The Prevalence of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defects in Patients with Normal Visual Fields. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):2274.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency with which a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) occurs in patients with glaucoma but without VF loss when tested with SAP.

Methods: A retrospective study: The electronic medical records of 672 patients who presented to the Wills Eye Glaucoma Service from January to May 2012 were reviewed. All patients were included except those with: 1) Any condition preventing adequate visualization and examination of the pupil or optic nerve 2) Active infection of the anterior or posterior segments of the eye 3) Any intraocular surgical or laser procedure within the previous 4 weeks 4) Any cause other than glaucoma known to cause an RAPD 5) Only one eye, or fixed pupils Clinical parameters such as VA, IOP, C/D ratio, DDLS, or VF mean defect within 6 months of the documented RAPD testing were tabulated. A documented RAPD was considered a “true” RAPD if it correlated with inter-eye structural asymmetry (such as visual field mean defect, DDLS score, or cup/disc ratio). The visual fields were measured either with Humphrey or Octopus perimetry. Normal VF (Humphrey) was defined as an MD score of -6dB or more positive, WITHOUT any of the following: 3 adjacent data points of <5% with at least one point <1%; PSD significant at <.05 (or 5%); Glaucoma hemifield test "Outside normal limits". For Octopus, normal VF was defined as an MD score of -0.8 or more negative, with a Bebie curve line not intersecting with the lower confidence limit line.

Results: The analyzed sample size was 152, 28 of whom had visual field via Humphrey and 124 via Octopus. Among 152 analyzed subjects, 89 were RAPD negative, 63 were RAPD positive. Among the 63 positive subjects, 60 subjects had a “true” RAPD. There was high agreement between RAPD and "true" RAPD (kappa=0.96). 85% of the patients (Humphrey testing) had abnormal VF and 93% by Octopus. 55% of patients with abnormal VF (Humphrey) had a positive RAPD; 50% of those with normal VF had a positive RAPD. 39% of patients (Octopus) with abnormal VF had a positive RAPD, while 33% of those with normal VF had a positive RAPD. There was no association between presence of an RAPD and whether or not the field was normal (p=0.40 - Humphrey) (p=0.27 - Octopus).

Conclusions: Around 1/3 to 1/2 of patients in a tertiary glaucoma practice have a positive RAPD in the absence of a visual field defect being detected by Octopus or Humphrey perimetry.

Keywords: 463 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • 668 pupillary reflex • 758 visual fields  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×