June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Vision after Wavefront-guided (WFG) vs. Wavefront-optimized (WFO) Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Denise Ryan
    US Army Warfighter Refractive Surg Research Ctr, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Rose Sia
    US Army Warfighter Refractive Surg Research Ctr, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Richard Stutzman
    Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
  • Joseph Pasternak
    Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
  • Lamarr Peppers
    US Army Warfighter Refractive Surg Research Ctr, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Jennifer Eaddy
    US Army Warfighter Refractive Surg Research Ctr, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Lorie Logan
    US Army Warfighter Refractive Surg Research Ctr, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Edward Trudo
    US Army Warfighter Refractive Surg Research Ctr, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Kraig Bower
    The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Denise Ryan, None; Rose Sia, None; Richard Stutzman, None; Joseph Pasternak, None; Lamarr Peppers, None; Jennifer Eaddy, None; Lorie Logan, None; Edward Trudo, None; Kraig Bower, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3135. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Denise Ryan, Rose Sia, Richard Stutzman, Joseph Pasternak, Lamarr Peppers, Jennifer Eaddy, Lorie Logan, Edward Trudo, Kraig Bower; Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Vision after Wavefront-guided (WFG) vs. Wavefront-optimized (WFO) Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3135.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To compare higher order aberration (HOA) root mean square (RMS) and patient satisfaction of postoperative vision after WFG vs. WFO PRK.

 
Methods
 

Participants randomized to receive WFG PRK (VISX Star S4, Abbott Medical Optics) or WFO PRK (Wavelight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q, Alcon Surgical) underwent testing to determine their HOA RMS preoperatively and at 6 months (M) postoperatively. RMS HOA were analyzed at four different pupil sizes (4, 5, 6, and 7mm) using Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System (COAS, Abbott Medical Optics). A repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was used to compare WFG vs. WFO PRK HOA RMS at each pupil size over time. Participants responded to a questionnaire preoperatively and 6M postoperatively. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare patient satisfaction of postoperative vision. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 
Results
 

PRK was performed on 26 WFG and 26 WFO participants. There were no significant differences in preoperative age or manifest spherical equivalent (MSE): Age: 30.0 ±7.0 years (y) WFG vs. 29.9 ±5.6y WFO, p=0.90; MSE: -3.49±1.88 Diopters (D) WFG vs. -3.33±1.79 WFO, p=0.66. MSE at 6M was 0.09±0.38 WFG vs. -0.02±0.31 WFO, p=0.09. Results of HOA RMS analysis at each pupil size, over time are presented in Figure 1. Comparing WFG vs. WFO over time at each pupil size p=0.04, 0.03, 0.08, 0.03 at 4mm, 5mm, 6mm, and 7mm respectively. Results from the questionnaire are presented in Table 1.

 
Conclusions
 

Results show there is a significant difference in RMS HOA when comparing WFG vs. WFO PRK over time. Although there was a significant increase in HOA RMS of WFO PRK patients postoperatively, questionnaire results showed no significant difference in daily activities, glare, halo or satisfaction with the procedure when comparing WFG vs. WFO PRK. Ongoing testing in this study will determine if either WFG or WFO generated optical quality affects military task performance.

 
 
Figure 1. WFG vs. WFO PRK higher order aberrations (HOA) root mean square (RMS)
 
Figure 1. WFG vs. WFO PRK higher order aberrations (HOA) root mean square (RMS)
 
 
Table 1. Patient satisfaction and quality of vision questionnaire results.
 
Table 1. Patient satisfaction and quality of vision questionnaire results.
 
Keywords: 679 refractive surgery: comparative studies • 686 refractive surgery: PRK • 669 quality of life  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×