June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
A comparison of microperimetry parameters derived from the CenterVue MAIA and Nidek MP1S instruments in subjects with type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia (MacTel)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Fred Chen
    Ocular Tissue Engineering Lab, Ctr for Ophthal & Visual Sci, UWA, Nedlands, WA, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
  • Ian Constable
    Ocular Tissue Engineering Lab, Ctr for Ophthal & Visual Sci, UWA, Nedlands, WA, Australia
  • Evan Wong
    Molecular Ophthalmology, Lions Eye Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Fred Chen, None; Ian Constable, Lions Eye Institute (P), Avalanche Biotechnologies (C); Evan Wong, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3605. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Fred Chen, Ian Constable, Evan Wong; A comparison of microperimetry parameters derived from the CenterVue MAIA and Nidek MP1S instruments in subjects with type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia (MacTel). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3605.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To compare the retinal sensitivity and fixation stability measurements derived from 2 microperimeters in a cohort of subjects with MacTel.

 
Methods
 

In this prospective study, 13 patients with MacTel were enrolled. Mean acuity (SD) of the study eye was 74 (11) ETDRS letters. Using the same testing strategy (37 loci in central 6 degrees, 4-2 step, 200 ms), one eye of each patient was tested on two microperimetry devices in a randomized order in each session, for 3 sessions separated by 1 month apart. The difference in mean retinal sensitivity (MRS), temporal-wedge sensitivity (TWS), central-point sensitivity (CPS) and fixation stability (logBCEA) between the devices was analyzed by Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA).

 
Results
 

Mean (SD) age was 60 (10) years. The average (SD) MRS derived from the MAIA and MP1S, for 13 subjects, over 3 visits, were 22.8 (4.3) and 14.0 (4.0) dB, respectively. The mean difference (95% LOA) was 8.8 dB (5.1 - 12.5) dB (p<0.001, paired t-test). Similarly, the average (SD) CPS derived from the MAIA and MP1S were 22.0 (3.6) and 13.1(4.9) dB, respectively. The mean difference (95% LOA) was 8.9 (3.5 - 14.3) dB (p<0.001, paired t-test). For the temporal wedge, the difference was smaller; 6.4 (-3.7 to 16.5) dB. This was driven by floor effects where some subjects had a dense scotoma in the temporal wedge resulting in a mean temporal wedge sensitivity of 0 on the MP1S. The average duration of microperimetry test for MAIA was 5’22’’, 5’15’’ and 5’09’’ for visits 1 to 3 respectively. For the MP1S, the duration of testing was 6’18’’, 7’14’’ and 6’35’’ for the 3 visits. Fixation stability in logBCEA (SD) at the final visit was 0.57 (0.28) and -0.08 (0.43) for MAIA and MP1S respectively (p<0.001). The mean difference for logBCEA (95% LOA) was 0.65 (0.02-1.29).

 
Conclusions
 

A small 37 loci grid microperimetry can be completed within 7 minutes per eye in MacTel subjects. Despite the same background luminance, MAIA and MP1S have different dynamic range of test locus luminance; 20 dB for the MP1S and 36 dB for the MAIA. Based on the differences in dynamic range and the luminance of the brightest stimulus, the expected discrepancy between the 2 microperimeters for retinal sensitivity should be 4 dB, much lower than the observed 9 dB difference.

     
Keywords: 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical • 585 macula/fovea • 688 retina  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×