June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Tolerance to astigmatism with a small aperture corneal inlay
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Abhiram Vilupuru
    R&D, AcuFocus, Inc, Irvine, CA
  • Juan Tabernero
    Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Pablo Artal
    Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Abhiram Vilupuru, AcuFocus (E); Juan Tabernero, None; Pablo Artal, AMO (C), Voptica SL (P), Voptica SL (I), AMO (F), Calhoun Vision (F), Calhoun Vision (C), AcuFocus (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 4280. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Abhiram Vilupuru, Juan Tabernero, Pablo Artal; Tolerance to astigmatism with a small aperture corneal inlay. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):4280.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Small aperture corneal inlays are used to extend depth of focus in presbyopic patients. Visual outcomes depend on residual refractive error. While the impact of defocus was already studied (Tabernero & Artal, JCRS, 2011), we expanded their study to investigate how much uncorrected astigmatism can be tolerated with a small aperture corneal inlay.

Methods: We developed 20 computational eye models using data from corneal topography, ocular axial lengths and wavefront aberrations taken in 20 healthy presbyopic subjects (mean age 59 years, standard deviation 7 years). The axial length was adjusted to render all eyes to be at best focus (emmetropia). A small aperture of 1.6 mm of diameter was placed at the corneal plane. The pupil of the eye was set to 3 mm of diameter. Astigmatism was induced in steps of 0.25 D (axis 90°) by placing a cylindrical lens at 15 mm from the corneal axis and then the eye’s modulation transfer function (for monochromatic light of 550 nm) was obtained for every eye from 0 D up to 3 D of induced astigmatism. The spatial frequency that corresponded to a modulation value of 0.2 (along the orthogonal direction to the axis of the astigmatism) was used as an image quality metric and calculated in every eye with and without the small aperture.

Results: With the small aperture implanted in the cornea, the cut-off frequencies increased significantly for all values of induced astigmatism. On average for the 20 eyes, if 1 D of astigmatism remained uncorrected for a pupil diameter of 3 mm (which corresponds to a 0.2 cut-off frequency of 0.22 decimal visual acuity units) then the equivalent value with the small aperture inlay implanted is obtained at 1.9 D (i.e. an increasing of 0.9 D of tolerance to astigmatism). For a different uncorrected threshold value of astigmatism, for instance to 0.5 D, then the tolerance with the small aperture would double up to 1 D. Since the inlay is actually an annulus (external diameter of 3.8 mm), this tolerance would be lower in those subjects with pupil diameters significantly larger than 4 mm.

Conclusions: The retinal image quality in eyes implanted with a small aperture corneal inlay to extend depth of focus is affected by the remaining uncorrected astigmatism. Although there is an individual variability due to the particular eye’s aberrations, the presence of the small aperture approximately doubles the typical tolerance to astigmatism.

Keywords: 653 presbyopia • 682 refractive surgery: other technologies • 428 astigmatism  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.