June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Adhesion of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Delftia acidovorans and Achromobacter xylosoxidans to contact lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ajay Kumar Vijay
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Mark Willcox
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ajay Kumar Vijay, Bausch+Lomb (F); Mark Willcox, Allergan Inc (C), Allergan Inc (R), Brien Holden Vision Institute (P), Bausch + Lomb (C), Basuch + Lomb (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 506. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ajay Kumar Vijay, Mark Willcox; Adhesion of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Delftia acidovorans and Achromobacter xylosoxidans to contact lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):506.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Contact lens cases become contaminated with microbes during use with certain MPDS containing Polyquaternium/Aldox associated with high levels of Gram-negatives in cases, and the degree of contamination is dependent on the type of multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS) that is used. Furthermore, the MPDS solution that has high levels of case contamination is also associated with higher levels of infiltrates during lens wear. Thus, we wished to establish whether microbes isolated from these MPDS/lens cases were able to adhere to contact lenses, as this is hypothesized to be the likely mechanism for transfer to the eye leading to the production of infiltrates.

Methods: Strains of D. acidovorans, S. maltophilia, A. xylosoxidans and P. aeruginosa isolated from contact lens cases (or contact lenses at time of infiltrative response, P. aeruginosa only) were used. Initially S. maltophilia was grown on agar plate overnight, cells collected and washed once in PBS and re-suspended in 1:100 TSB:PBS at 1.0 x 105 to 1.0 x 109 cfu/ml and allowed to adhere to lenses (senofilcon A or etafilcon A) for 24 hours. Subsequently, all strains of bacteria were allowed to adhere to lenses for 24 hours at starting inoculum of 1.0 x 107 cfu/ml. The numbers of bacteria adherent to each lens type was estimated by culture.

Results: The adhesion of S.maltophilia to lenses was not affected by initial inoculum size, with adhesion reaching 6.3 ± 0.2 log10cfu/lens after 24 hours. Using initial inocula of 1.0 x 107cfu/ml, adhesion to etafilcon A ranged from 5.0 ± 0.1 log10cfu/lens for A. xylosoxidans to 6.2 ± 0.0 log10cfu/lens for S.maltophilia. Adhesion to senofilcon A ranged from 5.1 ± 0.3 log10cfu/lens for D. acidovorans to 6.2 ± 0.3 log10cfu/lens for P. aeruginosa. Adhesion to etafilcon A was significantly higher (p<0.05) for P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia compared to D. acidovorans or A. xylosoxidans; adhesion to senofilcon A was significantly higher (p<0.05) for P.aeruginosa only.

Conclusions: This study has found that bacteria that are commonly found in contact lens cases of Polyquaternium/Aldox care systems can adhere to contact lenses in relatively high numbers. This may facilitate their transfer into the eye and the production of corneal infiltrates.

Keywords: 477 contact lens • 480 cornea: basic science • 433 bacterial disease  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.