June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Slow flash multifocal electroretinograms in the foveola
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yoshiaki Shimada
    Ophthalmology, Fujita Health Univ Banbuntane Hosp, Nagoya, Japan
  • Akira Nakamura
    Ophthalmology, Fujita Health Univ School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
  • Atsuhiro Tanikawa
    Ophthalmology, Fujita Health Univ School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
  • Masayuki Horiguchi
    Ophthalmology, Fujita Health Univ School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Yoshiaki Shimada, None; Akira Nakamura, None; Atsuhiro Tanikawa, None; Masayuki Horiguchi, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 6136. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yoshiaki Shimada, Akira Nakamura, Atsuhiro Tanikawa, Masayuki Horiguchi; Slow flash multifocal electroretinograms in the foveola. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):6136.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in the foveola.

Methods: mfERGs were recorded from 5 healthy trained subjects with isomeric 509 stimulus elements, 18.75 Hz base-rate, 29 minutes net recording time and 2.67 cds/m2 stimulus intensity. The response at the centermost element corresponding to the foveola (≤1.0 degree in diameter) was assessed as the foveolar mfERG.

Results: The first order kernel (K1) of the foveolar mfERG had the prolonged peak times of the b-wave and the negative deflection following the b-wave, while the a-wave peak time was not extended. The first slice of the second order kernel (K2.1) of the foveolar mfERG was strikingly larger than that of the surrounding mfERGs and unique in shape with the prominent component with a long peak time around 50 ms (P50) .

Conclusions: The 2.1 waveform in the foveola was different from that of the surrounding mfERGs or that obtained by full field pseudorandom stimuli (Hori et al. 2003). Although the K2.1 waveform varies deeply depending on the base rate, the P50 had dominated the K2.1 of the foveolar mfERG even with the fast (75 Hz base-rate) flash (Shimada et al. 2012). The wider temporal divergence between the a-wave and the following components in the K1, and P50 in the K2.1 of the foveolar mfERG probably reflect the peculiar and expansive neural structures in the foveola.

Keywords: 510 electroretinography: non-clinical • 689 retina: distal (photoreceptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells)  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×