April 1994
Volume 35, Issue 5
Free
Articles  |   April 1994
Influence of corneal shape on limbal light focusing.
Author Affiliations
  • A J Maloof
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  • A Ho
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  • M T Coroneo
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 1994, Vol.35, 2592-2598. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A J Maloof, A Ho, M T Coroneo; Influence of corneal shape on limbal light focusing.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994;35(5):2592-2598.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

PURPOSE: Light incident at the temporal cornea is focused by the peripheral anterior eye to the nasal limbus, the usual site of pterygium formation. Parameters that may contribute to observed individual variations in the degree of limbal light focusing were assessed. METHODS: Computer-assisted optical ray tracing techniques were applied to a human anterior segment model. The angle of incident light (theta, 95 degrees to 108 degrees posterior to the sagittal plane), corneal central radius of curvature (ro, 7.2 to 8.4 mm), and shape factor (p) were varied, and the effect on distal limbal intensity (I) was calculated. RESULTS: The magnitude of intensity peaks (Ipeak) is dependent on theta and ro. Steeper corneas have higher intensity peaks (Ipeak approximately 21.5X at ro = 7.2 mm, p = 0.75), and flatter corneas have lower intensity peaks (Ipeak approximately 8X at ro = 8.4 mm, p = 0.75) (cf Ipeak approximately 14X for a standard cornea, ro = 7.8 mm, p = 0.75). Anteroposterior location of intensity peaks is dependent on theta and ro. Steeper corneas have intensity peaks situated more anteriorly, whereas flatter corneas have more posteriorly placed peaks. Distal light distribution profiles demonstrate that intensity peaks are not always centrally located. At lower angles of incidence (theta = 100 degrees, ro = 7.8 mm, p = 0.75), peak intensity is located approximately 1 mm above and below the horizontal plane. The overall distribution (envelope) of light at the distal limbus is apparently independent of corneal shape. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in corneal topography can account for the clinical observation of individual variation in the degree of limbal light focusing. Whether individuals with corneas capable of developing intense limbal foci may be more predisposed to developing pterygium requires further study.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×