April 1997
Volume 38, Issue 5
Free
Articles  |   April 1997
Visible and ultraviolet-B ocular-ambient exposure ratios for a general population. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team.
Author Affiliations
  • D D Duncan
    Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 20723-6099, USA.
  • B Muñoz
    Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 20723-6099, USA.
  • K Bandeen-Roche
    Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 20723-6099, USA.
  • S K West
    Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 20723-6099, USA.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 1997, Vol.38, 1003-1011. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D D Duncan, B Muñoz, K Bandeen-Roche, S K West; Visible and ultraviolet-B ocular-ambient exposure ratios for a general population. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1997;38(5):1003-1011.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the numerical value of the ocular-ambient exposure ratio (OAER) (ratio of the facial exposure to that on a horizontal plane) as a function of wavelength band, season, and job category and to establish the effect of various modifiers, such as geography and the use of hats, for use in general population studies. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-four persons within several job categories representing the jobs in our Salisbury, Maryland, population were instrumented with ultraviolet-B (UVB) and visible band sensors for 1 complete day. Studies were done over all four seasons, both with and without hats. RESULTS: OAERs in the UVB wavelength band generally are higher than in the visible (13% versus 6%), display no significant variation with job category, show a seasonal effect (highest in the winter-spring [18%], lowest in the summer [10%], and intermediate in the fall [14%]), and are reduced 34% by the use of hats. In the visible wavelength band, OAERs are affected weakly by job function, although this variation is not significant, display a seasonal effect with three seasons as in the UVB, and are not affected significantly by the use of hats. In neither the UVB nor the visible portions of the spectrum did the authors find an effect on the OAER due to photophobia or eye color. CONCLUSIONS: With the authors' exposure model, the authors have at their disposal a valuable tool for exploring the relation between UVB, UVA, and visible radiation and a number of age-related eye diseases.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×