Purchase this article with an account.
Rajeev R. Pappuru, Yanling Ouyang, Muneeswar Gupta Nittala, Houman D. Hemmati, Pearse A. Keane, Alexander C. Walsh, Srinivas R. Sadda; Relationship between Outer Retinal Thickness Substructures and Visual Acuity in Eyes with Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(9):6743-6748. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6723.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
To explore the correlation between outer retinal substructures and visual acuity in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Analysis of spectral domain optical coherence tomography datasets from 100 eyes of 100 consecutive patients with dry AMD was performed. The internal limiting membrane, outer nuclear layer (ONL), external limiting membrane (ELM), inner segment-outer segment (IS-OS) junction, outer photoreceptor border, inner and outer retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) borders, and Bruch's membrane, were manually segmented by Doheny Image Reading Center (DIRC) graders. Areas, thicknesses, and volumes of RPE, IS, OS, ONL, and the total retina in the foveal central subfield were correlated with the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity using univariable and multivariable regression analysis.
The visual acuity in this group ranged from logMAR 0 to 1.3 with a mean of 0.23. Areas, thicknesses, and volumes of ONL, IS and OS, thicknesses of total retinal and RPE, and intensities of IS, OS, and RPE, showed statistically significant association (P < 0.05) with logMAR best corrected visual acuity. The highest correlations were observed for the ONL (thickness: r = −0.49, volume: −0.47, area: −0.50) and photoreceptor IS (thickness: −0.59, area: −0.63, volume: −0.53). The model with the highest correlation in this study included thicknesses of ONL, IS, OS and RPE, as well as area of ONL, IS, OS, RPE, and intensity of RPE.
Although integrity of outer retinal substructures in the foveal central subfield correlates with visual acuity in the eyes of patients with dry AMD, the correlation is only moderate and does not fully explain the variability in acuity in these cases.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only