March 2015
Volume 56, Issue 3
Free
Erratum  |   March 2015
Erratum
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2015, Vol.56, 1593. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9989a
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Erratum. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(3):1593. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9989a.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Erratum in: “Involvement of RhoA/Rho-Associated Kinase Signal Transduction Pathway in Dexamethasone-Induced Alterations in Aqueous Outflow” by Tomokazu Fujimoto, Toshihiro Inoue, Takanori Kameda, Nanako Kasaoka, Miyuki Inoue-Mochita, Naoko Tsuboi, and Hidenobu Tanihara (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7097–7108) doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9989 
In Table 2, the values of “DEX vs. Y-27632+DEX” were incorrectly shown to be the same as those of “Control vs. DEX.” The corrected table appears below. 
Time, h Outflow Facility, μL/min/mm Hg, Mean ± SE PValue,t-Test
Control vs. DEX, n = 5 Control 100 nM DEX
Baseline 0.514 ± 0.066 0.538 ± 0.021 0.673
24 0.626 ± 0.086 0.415 ± 0.070 0.036
48 0.623 ± 0.059 0.412 ± 0.032 0.042
72 0.606 ± 0.067 0.391 ± 0.054 0.025
168 0.725 ± 0.131 0.451 ± 0.078 0.068
Control vs. Y-27632 + DEX, n = 4, *n = 3 Control 50 μM Y-27632 + 100 nM DEX
Baseline 0.557 ± 0.119 0.562 ± 0.116 0.884
24 0.675 ± 0.154 0.678 ± 0.148 0.954
48 0.624 ± 0.140 0.653 ± 0.123 0.614
72 0.615 ± 0.157 0.653 ± 0.137 0.536
168 0.985 ± 0.611* 0.833 ± 0.172* 0.762
DEX vs. Y-27632 + DEX, n = 3 100 nM DEX 50 μM Y-27632 + 100 nM DEX
Baseline 0.662 ± 0.062 0.640 ± 0.081 0.369
24 0.703 ± 0.023 0.729 ± 0.055 0.766
48 0.671 ± 0.035 0.728 ± 0.054 0.521
72 0.678 ± 0.056 0.875 ± 0.082 0.029
168 0.665 ± 0.057 0.875 ± 0.107 0.323
Citation: Fujimoto T, Inoue T, Kameda T, Kasaoka N, Inoue-Mochita M, Tsuboi N, Tanihara H. Erratum in: Involvement of RhoA/Rho-associated kinase signal transduction pathway in dexamethasone-induced alterations in aqueous outflow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7097–7108. DOI:10.1167/iovs.12-9989a
Time, h Outflow Facility, μL/min/mm Hg, Mean ± SE PValue,t-Test
Control vs. DEX, n = 5 Control 100 nM DEX
Baseline 0.514 ± 0.066 0.538 ± 0.021 0.673
24 0.626 ± 0.086 0.415 ± 0.070 0.036
48 0.623 ± 0.059 0.412 ± 0.032 0.042
72 0.606 ± 0.067 0.391 ± 0.054 0.025
168 0.725 ± 0.131 0.451 ± 0.078 0.068
Control vs. Y-27632 + DEX, n = 4, *n = 3 Control 50 μM Y-27632 + 100 nM DEX
Baseline 0.557 ± 0.119 0.562 ± 0.116 0.884
24 0.675 ± 0.154 0.678 ± 0.148 0.954
48 0.624 ± 0.140 0.653 ± 0.123 0.614
72 0.615 ± 0.157 0.653 ± 0.137 0.536
168 0.985 ± 0.611* 0.833 ± 0.172* 0.762
DEX vs. Y-27632 + DEX, n = 3 100 nM DEX 50 μM Y-27632 + 100 nM DEX
Baseline 0.662 ± 0.062 0.640 ± 0.081 0.369
24 0.703 ± 0.023 0.729 ± 0.055 0.766
48 0.671 ± 0.035 0.728 ± 0.054 0.521
72 0.678 ± 0.056 0.875 ± 0.082 0.029
168 0.665 ± 0.057 0.875 ± 0.107 0.323
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×