April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) variability: comparison of two methods for recording.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vittoria De Rosa
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Leopoldo Spadea
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Serena Fragiotta
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Alessandro Cutini
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Cristina Diana
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Michela Marcelli
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Enzo M Vingolo
    Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, U.O.S. Ophthalmology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Terracina, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Vittoria De Rosa, None; Leopoldo Spadea, None; Serena Fragiotta, None; Alessandro Cutini, None; Cristina Diana, None; Michela Marcelli, None; Enzo Vingolo, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1124. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Vittoria De Rosa, Leopoldo Spadea, Serena Fragiotta, Alessandro Cutini, Cristina Diana, Michela Marcelli, Enzo M Vingolo; Bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) variability: comparison of two methods for recording.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1124.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) values obtained using two different methods to calculate fixation stability.

Methods: 57 healthy subjects (57 eyes) and 54 age related macular degeneration (AMD) patients (54 eyes) were enrolled to perform two consecutive examinations, fixation test before and during microperimetry, using MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Technologies, NAVIS software version 1.7.6). Fixation stability was quantified by calculating the BCEA obtained during a 30 second fixation test. A 2° red cross was used as fixation target. Microperimetric examination was performed using the same target of fixation test, Humphrey 10 to 2 grid of 68-loci grid, stimuli Goldmann III with a projection time of 200 ms, white background illumination of 4 asb (1.27 cd/m2), and a 4-2 staircase strategy. BCEA (deg2) was normalized by logarithmic transformation (Shapiro-Wilk test, p<0.05). Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and a Bland-Altman analysis to assess the reliability of measurements. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: In healthy subjects, mean log BCEA recorded during fixation test was significantly smaller than microperimetry examination (P<0.001, in all three standard deviations). Also in AMD group there was a highly significant differences between the two methods of recording BCEA (P<0.001, in the 3 standard deviations). The Bland Altman plot analysis that demonstrates there were not agreement between two methods of quantifying BCEA.

Conclusions: BCEA calculated with fixation test is significantly smaller respect to microperimetric examination. This is probably due to short duration and the ease of performance of the fixation test, whereas microperimetric BCEA may be influenced by the duration of examination and by the projection of the stimuli at different locations. In AMD patients to detect changes in fixation stability is important to use the same method during follow-up. Finally, fixation test seems to have less variability than microperimetric examination.

Keywords: 524 eye movements: recording techniques • 412 age-related macular degeneration • 641 perception  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×