April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Myopia prevalence in Europe: cohort effect of increasing prevalence not fully explained by higher educational levels
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christopher J Hammond
    Ophthalmology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Christopher Hammond, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1268. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher J Hammond, ; Myopia prevalence in Europe: cohort effect of increasing prevalence not fully explained by higher educational levels. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1268.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To examine the prevalence of myopia in Europe, investigate whether it is becoming more common, and to explore whether this can be explained by increasing levels of education.

 
Methods
 

Refractive error data were analysed from 13 population-based cohorts of the E3 Consortium, collected between 1990 and 2012. Mean spherical equivalent (SE) of the two eyes was calculated. Participants reporting cataract, retinal detachment or laser refractive surgery were excluded. Myopia was defined as ≤-0.75 D and high myopia as ≤-6 D. Sequential random effect meta-analyses were performed with age stratification. Geographical differences were examined according to the United Nations Geoscheme. The effects of birth year and education level were investigated, stratifying participants into primary (<16 leaving education), secondary (16-19) or higher education (≥ 20).

 
Results
 

SE was available for 58,999 subjects with median cohort ages 44-78 years, 57.9% female and minimal ethnic variation (99% European ancestry). Overall myopia prevalence was 23.8% (95% CI 19.3-28.4) with high myopia affecting 2.1%. Myopia was more common in younger subjects; 42.3% (95% CI 38.7-45.9) aged 20-30 years, compared to 29.0% (95% CI 24.8-33.2) aged 50-60. Prevalence of myopia did not differ by geographical area. A cohort effect for rising myopia prevalence was apparent; in those aged 55-60 born between 1930-39, 22.6% (95% CI 20.2-25.0) were myopic, increasing to 25.4% (95% CI 23.9-26.9) if born between 1940-49 and to 33.0% (95% CI 30.3-35.7) if born between 1950-59. Education level and birth year both affected myopia prevalence [Figure 1]; compared to a reference group of primary education and 1930-39 birth year, participants with higher education had a two-fold increase in myopia prevalence and a three-fold increase in those with higher education and born between 1950 and 1959.

 
Conclusions
 

A quarter of subjects in population-based cohorts across Europe are myopic, higher in younger subjects. There appears to be a cohort effect of increasing myopia prevalence. Education is strongly associated with myopia and education levels have risen, but the length of time in education does not fully explain the cohort effect. Further research is required to investigate if the cohort effect is explained by changes in educational experience and other factors.

 
 
Myopia prevalence by birth year and education in subjects aged 45-65
 
Myopia prevalence by birth year and education in subjects aged 45-65
 
Keywords: 605 myopia • 463 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • 464 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×