April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure of Infants Obtained Using Three Portable Tonometers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tomomi Nakamura
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Yoshiaki Kiuchi
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Yosuke Sugimoto
    Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Tomomi Nakamura, None; Yoshiaki Kiuchi, None; Yosuke Sugimoto, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 130. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tomomi Nakamura, Yoshiaki Kiuchi, Yosuke Sugimoto; Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure of Infants Obtained Using Three Portable Tonometers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):130.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the agreement among portable tonometers; the iCare, iCare PRO and the Tonopen AVIA. We also examined the impact of the central corneal thickness on the intraocular pressure (IOP) readings.

Methods: IOP measurements were taken from the both eyes of 16 infants. The subject’s ages ranged from 33 pregnant weeks and corrected 83 pregnant weeks. The IOP values were measured without using an eye lid opener during a quiet stage. When the baby cried, we waited until the baby settled down. Tonometry using the iCare was performed while the infant’s face was turned sideways. The iCare PRO and Tonopen AVIA were used with the infant in the supine position. The central corneal thickness was measured by an ultrasound pachymeter. The relationships among the mean IOPs were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients, and the mean differences between tonometers were examined using a one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis. The levels of agreement were evaluated using a Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: The mean IOPs (mean ± SD) were 9.32 ± 2.33mmHg for the iCare; 14.8 ± 3.4mmHg for the iCare PRO and 17.6 ± 6.80 mmHg for the Tonopen AVIA. Moderate correlations were observed between the iCare and Tonopen AVIA (r=0.546), and between the iCare PRO and Tonopen AVIA (r=0.452). A low correlation was observed between the iCare and iCare PRO (r=0.360). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference between the iCare and iCare PRO was 3.51 mmHg (p < 0.001). The post-hoc analysis indicated that there were significant differences between all pairs. The IOP readings obtained by the iCare and iCare PRO were unaffected by the central corneal thickness. There was a negative correlation between the central corneal thickness and the infants’ corrected age (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The IOP measurements obtained in infants using three portable tonometers were not interchangeable. The iCare PRO and Tonopen AVIA significantly overestimated the IOP values in the infants’ eyes compared with the iCare.

Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×