April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Consistency in Endothelial Cell Density Values from Different Central Locations as Graded by Specular Microscopy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Luisa F Obregon Jacome
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Cristina Modak
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Jianyan Huang
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Srinivas R Sadda
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Vikas Chopra
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Olivia L Lee
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Luisa Obregon Jacome, None; Cristina Modak, None; Jianyan Huang, None; Srinivas Sadda, None; Vikas Chopra, None; Olivia Lee, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2065. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Luisa F Obregon Jacome, Cristina Modak, Jianyan Huang, Srinivas R Sadda, Vikas Chopra, Olivia L Lee, Doheny Image Reading Center; Consistency in Endothelial Cell Density Values from Different Central Locations as Graded by Specular Microscopy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2065.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine if endothelial cell density (ECD) values from different central locations are comparable enough to one another to allow longitudinal evaluations from single central ECD readings in both normal and diseased eyes.

Methods: Multiple central images per eye from 34 control eyes and 22 glaucoma eyes, of which 5 had central corneal guttata, were captured using the non-contact Konan Specular microscope NP-9900. Three good quality images were selected for each eye included in the study. All images were manually graded by trained graders using Konan’s CellChek Analysis Software to obtain ECD measurements. The relative standard deviation (RSD), representing the percent difference from the mean, was used to assess ECD variation across images of the same cornea. Less than 2.5% RSD was considered acceptable agreement. For corneas with guttata, a previously described conversion formula was used to extrapolate an “effective” ECD from “local” ECD values, where percent areas were determined using the ImageJ image analysis software.

Results: 168 total images were analyzed. ECD values obtained from different images of the same cornea showed excellent agreement for controls (RSD=1.1%) and slightly more variability in patients without guttata (RSD=2.8%). On the other hand, ECD variation in patients with guttata (RSD=7.7%) was much greater. This variation could however be drastically reduced (RSD=0.6%) when “effective” ECD values were substituted.

Conclusions: ECD values from slightly different central locations show little variation in normal eyes and diseased eyes without guttata, and the same result can also be achieved in eyes with guttata after conversion to an “effective” ECD, suggesting that, with trained graders, single readings may be sufficiently effective in yielding accurate ECD values for the central cornea. These findings, which may allow single ECD readings from both normal and diseased eyes even in the presence of guttata, are very important for longitudinal studies requiring ECD values.

Keywords: 481 cornea: endothelium  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×