April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparison of Ultrasound and Scheimpflug Corneal Pachymetric Maps in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Raksha Urs
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
  • Timothy J Archer
    London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom
  • Marine Gobbe
    London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom
  • Michael Ha
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
  • Michele D Lee
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
  • Dan Z Reinstein
    London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom
  • Ronald H Silverman
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
    Riverside Research Institute, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Raksha Urs, None; Timothy Archer, None; Marine Gobbe, None; Michael Ha, None; Michele Lee, None; Dan Reinstein, Arcscan Inc (I), Cornell Research Foundation (P); Ronald Silverman, Arcscan Inc (I), Cornell Research Foundation (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2450. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Raksha Urs, Timothy J Archer, Marine Gobbe, Michael Ha, Michele D Lee, Dan Z Reinstein, Ronald H Silverman; Comparison of Ultrasound and Scheimpflug Corneal Pachymetric Maps in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2450.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound pachymetry has long been regarded as the gold standard for corneal thickness determination. Our aim was to compare measurements of corneal thickness from pachymetric maps obtained by the Pentacam Scheimpflug system with those obtained from the Artemis immersion scanning high-frequency ultrasound system and to assess the agreement between the two devices.

Methods: Corneal pachymetric maps of 28 normal and 28 keratoconic (KC) eyes (one per subject) were obtained from Artemis and Pentacam. For each map, the minimum corneal thickness (MCT) and mean corneal thickness in 0.5 mm-wide annuli of up to 3 mm radius around the location of MCT were determined. Thickness progression rate (TPR) was calculated as the slope of the mean annuli thickness as a function of distance from location of MCT.

Results: The MCT of normal eyes from Artemis and Pentacam corneal pachymetric maps were 493.7 ± 32.3 µm and 507.9 ± 32.6 µm respectively and 450.1 ± 55.8 µm and 469.8 ± 52.3 µm for KC eyes. There was high correlation between the MCT readings by the two methods (R = 0.95 for normal eyes and R = 0.96 for KC eyes). Bland-Altman analysis showed that Pentacam values of MCT exceeded Artemis values by 14.3 µm in normal eyes and 19.7 µm in KC eyes. Mean corneal thickness values in each of the 0.5 mm annuli were also highly correlated (R>0.94 for normal eyes and R>0.92 for KC eyes). At the outermost annulus, Pentacam values were thicker by approximately 27 µm in both normal and KC eyes. The average TPR in normal eyes were 17.2 ± 2.5 µm/mm and 21.9 ± 2.5 µm/mm for Artemis and Pentacam, and 33.8 ± 13.1 µm/mm and 35.7 ± 13.3 µm/mm respectively in KC eyes.

Conclusions: While Artemis and Pentacam corneal thickness measurements are highly correlated in both normal and KC eyes, Pentacam values were systematically thicker, with a larger difference at the periphery.

Keywords: 574 keratoconus • 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical • 419 anatomy  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×