April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparing Visual Image Quality with Objectively and Subjectively Derived Spectacle Corrections in Subjects with Keratoconus
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jason D Marsack
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Lingyan Anderson
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Ayeswarya Ravikumar
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Heather A Anderson
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Jos J Rozema
    Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
    Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciencies, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
  • Raymond A Applegate
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jason Marsack, None; Lingyan Anderson, None; Ayeswarya Ravikumar, None; Heather Anderson, None; Jos Rozema, None; Raymond Applegate, 7,857,451 (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2714. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jason D Marsack, Lingyan Anderson, Ayeswarya Ravikumar, Heather A Anderson, Jos J Rozema, Raymond A Applegate; Comparing Visual Image Quality with Objectively and Subjectively Derived Spectacle Corrections in Subjects with Keratoconus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2714.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Subjective refraction is typically challenging in patients with keratoconus (KC) due, in part, to the presence of elevated higher-order aberrations (HOA). However, aberrations interact, providing an opportunity to use sphere and cylinder to optimize visual image quality in the presence of elevated HOA. The purpose of this study was to objectively search for the residual sphero-cylindrical error that maximized visual image quality in the presence of uncorrected HOA in KC and to compare resultant visual image quality and expected gain in acuity to that achieved with subjectively prescribed spectacles.

Methods: Uncorrected 5mm wavefront error was previously obtained for right eyes of 56 KC subjects. Third - 8th order aberration data were combined with 8177 unique residual sphero-cylindrical error conditions within ±2.00D of sphere (0.25D steps) and up to -2D of cylinder (0.25D steps) of a full lower-order (sphero-cylindrical) correction. Resulting Zernike descriptions were used to identify the maximal objectively derived value of the visual image quality metric visual Strehl ratio (VSX). Habitual sphero-cylindrical corrections (available in 10 of the eyes) were also mathematically applied to the 2nd - 8th order uncorrected aberration data, and the resulting data utilized to calculate subjectively derived VSX.

Results: In the 22 eyes where VSX achieved a maximal value within the range of sphero-cylindrical conditions studied, the objectively derived VSX value was better than the value with zeroed lower-order terms (p<0.0015) with median maximized VSX values of 0.189 (1Q: 0.091; 3Q:0.227) and 0.041 (1Q: 0.015; 3Q:0.075) respectively. Likewise, the refraction defined objectively produced larger values of VSX (p < 0.002) in the 10 eyes than the habitual spectacles, where median maximized VSX was 0.058 (1Q: 0.049 3Q: 0.081). The predicted mean gain in VA with the objective vs. subjective correction based on models in the literature was 2.5 lines.

Conclusions: VSX values achieved with this optimization were better than those achieved by simply zeroing lower order terms or those obtained with subjective refraction. These data suggest visual performance for KC patients wearing spectacles might be improved if they are prescribed objectively, using metrics predictive of visual performance, considering a large number of possible residual lower- order error conditions.

Keywords: 574 keratoconus • 718 spectacle lens • 626 aberrations  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×