April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Choroidal Thickness variation in Emmetropic and Myopic Eyes during the Water Drinking Test with Spectral Domain OCT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Renato Antunes Schiave Germano
    University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Marcelo Hatanaka
    University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Remo Susanna
    University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Renato Germano, None; Marcelo Hatanaka, None; Remo Susanna, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4337. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Renato Antunes Schiave Germano, Marcelo Hatanaka, Remo Susanna; Choroidal Thickness variation in Emmetropic and Myopic Eyes during the Water Drinking Test with Spectral Domain OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4337.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To evaluate choroidal thickness (CT) and its variation during the water drinking test (WDT) in emmetropic (EE) and myopic (ME) eyes using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT).

 
Methods
 

Prospective evaluation of 80 eyes (40 myopic and 40 emmetropic eyes from 20 healthy patients in each group) submitted to the water drinking test and SD-OCT macular scans performed 10 minutes and 45 minutes after water ingestion. WDT was performed under standard conditions and consisted of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement followed by ingestion of 1000 ml of tap water in five minutes and Goldmann applanation tonometry at 15, 30 and 45 minutes after starting the WDT. For statistical analysis, foveal CT as well as CT at 3 mm nasally and 3 mm temporally to the fovea were obtained.

 
Results
 

Mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.10±0.33 in emmetropic and -6.89±1.59 diopters in myopic eyes (p<0.001). IOP measurements during the WDT are shown in tables 1 and 2. Peak IOP was 14.6±2.7 mmHg and 14.0±2.0 mmHg (EE and ME, respectively). No statistical differences were found during WDT response between EE and ME. EE presented higher CT in both foveal and 3 mm nasal to the fovea, compared to myopic eyes, as shown in table 3 (336.65±70.08 vs 247.85±88.55; p<0.0001; and 150.77±62.31 vs 113.90±51.90; p=0.006, respectively). Statistically significant diferences were demonstrated at foveal CT, 10 minutes after water ingestion in both EE and ME. EE group: 2,67% thickness rise; p<0.0001. ME group: 3,45% thickness rise; p<0.0001. There was no correlation between peak IOP during WDT and CT thickness in EE (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = -0.06; p=071). A weak correlation between peak IOP during WDT and CT thickness was demonstrated in ME (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.36; p=0.01).

 
Conclusions
 

In our sample,CT was thinner in myopic eyes than in emmetropic eyes. Statistically significant IOP rise was detected during WDT in both emmetropic and myopic eyes.Statistically significant foveal CT rise was detected 10 minutes after water ingestion in both emmetropic and myopic eyes. A weak correlation between peak IOP during the WDT was found in myopic eye; although the same did not occur in emmetropic eyes.

     
Keywords: 452 choroid • 568 intraocular pressure • 552 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound)  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×