April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and Heidelberg Edge Perimeter for the detection of glaucoma with beginning visual field defects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alexander Friedrich Scheuerle
    Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Frauke J Seibel
    Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Stephan Schulz
    Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Gerd Auffarth
    Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Alexander Scheuerle, Heidelberg Engineering (C); Frauke Seibel, None; Stephan Schulz, Heidelberg Engineering (E); Gerd Auffarth, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4743. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alexander Friedrich Scheuerle, Frauke J Seibel, Stephan Schulz, Gerd Auffarth; Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and Heidelberg Edge Perimeter for the detection of glaucoma with beginning visual field defects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4743.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Early detection is crucial for the effective management of glaucoma. In a population of glaucoma patients with beginning visual field defects we compared the results of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT), of the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP) and of the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

 
Methods
 

26 eyes of 19 subjects with a median age of 64 years +/- 11 years (48 to 86) diagnosed with glaucoma defined by optic disc changes and a mean defect of -3.75 dB +/- 1.5 dB (-2 to -6.6 dB) in standard automated perimetry (Octopus, Haag Streit, Switzerland) were enrolled. In all eyes HRT for Moorfield Regression Analysis (MRA) was performed, 25 eyes underwent retinal nerve fiber measurement (cpRNFL) and 24 eyes were examined by Flicker-Defined-Form (FDF) Perimetry. The corresponding topographic locations of glaucomatous damage detected by the automated discriminant functions were matched with these three different instruments. We used a 6x6 grid in the posterior pole asymmetry analysis (PPAA) and a nerve fiber bundle defect was confirmed as 6 grey or black consecutive cells in a maximum of two adjoining rows.

 
Results
 

For each eye a pairwise comparison of the results of the three different instruments was performed. Results were compared regarding six sectors and three categories (within normal limits/borderline/outside normal limits). The comparison of pathologic results in corresponding topographic locations using MRA and cpRNFL showed agreement in 48.7%, using FDF and MRA in 47.7% and using FDF and cpRNFL in 38.1%. Comparing pathologic results neglecting the location highest accordance was presented in MRA and cpRNFL (56.7%), followed by FDF and MRA (54.5%) and also FDF and cpRNFL (42.1%). The PPAA showed a fiber bundle defect in 91.7% of the examined eyes.

 
Conclusions
 

Among the three tested combinations MRA and cpRNFL demonstrated the best agreement. If borderline cases were treated as out of normal limits highest accordance was presented in MRA and FDF. Functional damage detected by FDF might better correspond to reduced cpRNFL compared to MRA. PPAA demonstrated good sensitivity for the detection of nerve fiber bundle defects in our population. Further studies are necessary to evaluate which combination of different techniques serves best in early detection of glaucoma.

  
Keywords: 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical • 627 optic disc • 552 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound)  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×