April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Visual Impairment is Common among Participants in a Community-based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Emily W Gower
    Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • David S Friedman
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Julia A Haller
    Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Inst., Philadelphia, PA
  • David J Lee
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer, Miami, FL
  • Cynthia Owsley
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • Jinan Saaddine
    CDC, Atlanta, GA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Emily Gower, None; David Friedman, None; Julia Haller, None; David Lee, None; Cynthia Owsley, None; Jinan Saaddine, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5364. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emily W Gower, David S Friedman, Julia A Haller, David J Lee, Cynthia Owsley, Jinan Saaddine, ; Visual Impairment is Common among Participants in a Community-based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5364.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the level of walk-in visual impairment of adults with diabetes who present for diabetic retinopathy screening in community-based settings.

Methods: The Innovative Network for Site Research group (INSIGHT) conducted a multi-center prospective study of diabetic retinopathy screening among patients with diabetes in community-based clinic and pharmacy settings in Miami, Philadelphia, Birmingham, AL and Winston-Salem, NC. At their screening visit, we queried participants on their most recent eye exam and evaluated presenting distance visual acuity (with spectacles if present) using a Titmus V2 vision screener. All participants received monocular testing for each eye. The better eye acuity was defined as the visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. Significant vision impairment was defined as acuity of 20/50 or worse in the better-seeing eye.

Results: 1881 individuals at 4 sites had visual acuity data collected. 63% were female, and the mean age was 54 years. In total, 55% had a dilated exam within the past 2 years. The percent who reported an exam within the last 2 years varied substantially by site, ranging from 26% at Miami to 53% in Birmingham. 22% presented with acuity worse that 20/40 in their better eye and only 30% of patients presented with walk-in 20/20 acuity in both eyes. This percentage also varied by site, with Miami having the lowest percent with 20/20 acuity and UAB having the highest. An additional 49% had mild impairment (20/30 or 20/40 acuity in their better eye). Interestingly, the percent with impairment did not change substantially with increasing time since last dilated eye exam. The percent with impairment increased with increasing age.

Conclusions: The vast majority of these diabetic patients did not have 20/20 visual acuity. This finding highlights the importance of regular eye care for persons with diabetes in order to facilitate their having the best visual acuity possible. Methods to increase participation in eye care need to be identified.

Keywords: 499 diabetic retinopathy • 754 visual acuity  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×