April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Reliability Indices and Rates of Visual Field Change in Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gustavo V De Moraes
    Ophthalmology, New York Univ School of Med, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NEW YORK, NY
  • Jeffrey M Liebmann
    Ophthalmology, New York Univ School of Med, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NEW YORK, NY
  • Robert Ritch
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NEW YORK, NY
  • Theodore Krupin
    Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Gustavo De Moraes, Edith C. Blum Foundation (F), Merz Pharma (C), New York Glaucoma research Institute (F); Jeffrey Liebmann, Alcon, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc. (F), Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (C), Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (F), Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc. (F), Diopysis, inc. (C), Diopysis, inc. (F), Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH (C), Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH (F), Merz Phamaceuticals, Inc. (C), New York Glaucoma Research Institute (F), NIH (F), Optovue, inc (F), Quark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (F), Reichert, Inc. (F), Sensimed, Inc. (F), Topcon, Inc. (F), Valeant Pharmaceutiicals, Inc. (C); Robert Ritch, Allergan, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc. (F), Diopsys, Inc. (C), Diopsys, Inc. (F), Ocular Instruments (P); Theodore Krupin, Allergan, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc. (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5634. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gustavo V De Moraes, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Theodore Krupin, Low-pressure Glaucoma Study Group; Reliability Indices and Rates of Visual Field Change in Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5634.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the relationship between reliability indices (false-negative, false-positive, and fixation loss) and rates of visual field (VF) change in a cohort of patients from the Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS).

Methods: We analyzed the entire VF database of the LoGTS, a prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were tested with standard automated perimetry using 24-2 Full-Threshold Algorithm. All VF tests were included regardless of their reliability indices. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to determine the relationship between mean VF sensitivity and reliability indices.

Results: 2,945 VF tests of 134 patients (268 eyes) were analyzed. The mean sensitivity significantly changed over time at -0.24 dB/yr (P<0.001). There was a significant relationship between mean sensitivity change and false-negative rates: as VFs deteriorated, false-negatives increased (P<0.001). The relationship between mean sensitivity and false-positive and fixation loss rates was in the opposite direction: these indices decreased as VFs deteriorated over time. When VF tests with false-negative rates >33% were excluded, the mean (SE) rate of sensitivity change was -0.20(0.06) dB/yr; when the same cut-off was applied for false-positive and fixation loss rates, the mean rate was -0.24(0.06) in both cases. Only the change observed when false-negative rates >33% were removed was significantly different from when all fields were included (P<0.001). Selecting only fields with reliability indices ≤33%, the mean rate of sensitivity change was -0.18(0.06) dB/yr, which was significantly different from when all fields were included (P<0.001). By setting different cut-off values for false-negative rates, we observed significantly slower rates of sensitivity change as the criteria became more stringent (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Test-retest variance is higher among eyes with more severe VFs and is associated with more false-negatives.[1] In this exercise with patients followed longitudinally, we observed: 1) a learning effect which leads to decrease in false-positives and fixation losses over time; 2) analogous to what is known with regard to test-retest reliability,[1] as VFs progress, false-negative rates increase; and 3) measured rates of sensitivity change can vary significantly depending on cut-off values applied for reliability indices.1] Bengtsson, Heijl. IOVS 2000;41:2201.

Keywords: 642 perimetry  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×