April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
The Correlation Between a Dynamic Stimulus and Accommodation or Vergence Responses in Open-Loop Conditions During Infancy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Rowan Candy
    Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • Tawna L Roberts
    Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Erin Babinsky
    Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • Vivian Manh
    Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships T. Rowan Candy, None; Tawna Roberts, None; Erin Babinsky, None; Vivian Manh, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 754. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Rowan Candy, Tawna L Roberts, Erin Babinsky, Vivian Manh; The Correlation Between a Dynamic Stimulus and Accommodation or Vergence Responses in Open-Loop Conditions During Infancy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):754.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Postnatal retinal image quality and correspondence are defined by an infant's ability to accommodate and align their eyes to targets in a dynamic 3D environment. Numerous factors impact development of these coupled responses including immaturities in sensitivity to blur and disparity, the primary cues to accommodation and vergence. Infants' accommodation responses in the absence of disparity cues (cond 1), and vergence responses in the absence of blur feedback (cond 2) were determined, to understand the relative reliability of the two motor responses.

Methods: Accommodation and vergence responses were recorded simultaneously, at 25Hz, using the MCS PowerRefractor (photorefraction and Purkinje image eye tracking). 95 infants recruited and tested between 3 & 5 months, were tested again between 7 & 9 months. They viewed a 7cm x 7cm animated cartoon moving repeatedly on a motorized track between 80cm (1.25D) and 33cm (3D). In cond 1, the right eye was occluded with a near-IR filter eliminating disparity cues (while recording from both eyes). In cond 2, the cartoon screen was covered with a spatially low-pass material, with a 2D Difference of Gaussian (DOG) printed on it, to remove defocus feedback.

Results: Raw responses were filtered to remove outliers, based on manufacturer's recommendations and physiological plausibility. Correlations between responses and the stimulus profile were then calculated. At both ages, the vergence response in the absence of blur feedback was more highly correlated with the stimulus than accommodation responses in the absence of disparity cues (mean correlation: 3-5m = 0.27 (SD+/- 0.21) vs 0.02 (+/-0.23), p<0.001, 7-9m = 0.15 (SD+/-0.23) vs 0.01 (+/-0.24), p<0.001).

Conclusions: Although quite variable, vergence responses in the absence of blur feedback to accommodation were driven more reliably than accommodation in the absence of disparity, suggesting increased senstivity or reduced tolerance to error in vergence at these ages.

Keywords: 556 infant vision • 404 accommodation • 751 vergence  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×