June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Water drinking test in primary angle-closure suspects before and after laser peripheral iridotomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shravan Savant
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
    Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Michael Waisbourd
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Yi Sun
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Patricia Martinez
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Jonathan S Myers
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Shravan Savant, None; Michael Waisbourd, None; Yi Sun, None; Patricia Martinez, None; Jonathan Myers, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 107. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shravan Savant, Michael Waisbourd, Yi Sun, Patricia Martinez, Jonathan S Myers; Water drinking test in primary angle-closure suspects before and after laser peripheral iridotomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):107.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To compare the response to the provocative water drinking test (WDT) before and after laser iridotomy in primary angle closure suspects (PACS).

 
Methods
 

In this prospective study PACS underwent WDT once before undergoing LPI and two weeks after the LPI. On each visit, after obtaining a baseline IOP, subjects underwent the WDT (10 ml water per kg body weight over 15 minutes followed by IOP measurements every 15 minutes for the following hour). Outcome measures were mean, range, peak and fluctuation of IOP.

 
Results
 

Twenty patients (females (n=14, 70%)) were enrolled in the study. The mean age (±SD) was 58.1 (±10.2 SD) years. Figure 1 shows the mean baseline, peak and final IOP during the WDT, before and 2 weeks after performing LPI. Although Peak IOPs were similar, Average IOP range (maximum IOP - minimum IOP) during the WDT increased significantly from 2.6 mmHg (±1.1 SD) before the LPI to 3.5 mmHg (±1.5 SD) after the LPI (P=0.04). There was a trend toward a significant increase in the mean difference between peak IOP and the IOP at the end of the WDT at 60 minutes after the LPI, from 2.5 mmHg (±1.27 SD) to 3.3 mmHg (±1.66 SD), (P = 0.057). The WDT did not trigger acute angle closure in any patient.

 
Conclusions
 

PACS who underwent the WDT had a slightly more pronounced recovery of IOP after they had LPI performed. Differences in IOP curves before and after LPI were minimal, and therefore the WDT had limited value as a provocative test in this patient population.  

 
Figure 1: Mean IOP at each time point during Water Drinking Test Before and After LPI.
 
Figure 1: Mean IOP at each time point during Water Drinking Test Before and After LPI.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×