June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Do persons with diabetes want to decide on their own when treating diabetic retinopathy? The intended role of the ophthalmologist - results of the DiabCheckOCT+ Study.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lydia Marahrens
    Center for Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Daniel Roeck
    Center for Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Raimar Kern
    Department of Neurology, Autonomic and Neuroendocrinological Laboratory Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
  • Tjalf Ziemssen
    Department of Neurology, Autonomic and Neuroendocrinological Laboratory Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
  • Andreas Fritsche
    Department of Internal Medicine, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Focke Ziemssen
    Center for Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Lydia Marahrens, None; Daniel Roeck, Novartis (F); Raimar Kern, Bayer-Schering (R), Biogen Idec (R), Genzyme (R), Merck Serono (R), Novartis (R), Teva (R); Tjalf Ziemssen, Almirall (R), Bayer-Schering (C), Bayer-Schering (R), Biogen Idec (C), Biogen Idec (R), Deutsche Diabetes Stiftung (F), Genzyme (R), GSK (R), Hertie Foundation (F), Merck Serono (R), MSD (R), Novartis (C), Novartis (R), Roland Ernst Foundation (F), Sanofi-Aventis (R), Teva (C), Teva (R), the Robert Pfleger Foundation (F); Andreas Fritsche, None; Focke Ziemssen, Alcon (R), Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Allergan (R), Bayer (C), Bayer (R), Biogen (C), Biogen (R), Novartis (C), Novartis (F), Novartis (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 1372. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lydia Marahrens, Daniel Roeck, Raimar Kern, Tjalf Ziemssen, Andreas Fritsche, Focke Ziemssen; Do persons with diabetes want to decide on their own when treating diabetic retinopathy? The intended role of the ophthalmologist - results of the DiabCheckOCT+ Study.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):1372.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Physicians are not always aware of the risk to patronize their patients. While some people explicitly request for a paternalistic approach, disempowerment could contribute to unintended passiveness and gaps in knowledge which are known to be associated with worse metabolic control, especially in diabetes. In order to assess the patient’s point of view on codetermination, a prospective survey was initiated to assess the preferences for shared decision-making in a representative cohort.

 
Methods
 

The DiabCheck® trial was a non-interventional cross-sectional study of 810 adults in 3 secondary diabetes care centers during a period of 4 month. All patients of the investigator initiated study were included after confirmed diagnosis of diabetes and underwent a comprehensive eye examination. A questionnaire evaluated demographic characteristics, diabetes duration and type of treatment. Level of education and age were investigated as predictors of patients’ role preferences for decision-making. For categorical outcomes, χ2-test was used to test for significant differences in participants’ characteristics by group. For continuous outcomes, significant differences between strata were evaluated using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test (α=0.05).

 
Results
 

A majority of 74.3% (599 of 806) preferred shared decision-making. However, 17.4% selected a paternalistic approach with a decision-making only by the treating ophthalmologist. The preference for a patient-dominant decision was 8.3%. In contrast, 2.6% (21 of 806) wanted no medical and scientific information of the ophthalmologist.<br /> Participants wanting an ophthalmologist-dominant decision-making where significantly older (>60 years) and had a lower level of education (p<0.05). In this group, a wait-and-watch attitude was more frequently seen. However, participants with a higher level of education wished significantly more often to determine the preferred treatment alone (p<0.05). Even those in both groups, aiming for a unilateral decision mostly asked for a preceding exchange of information (186 of 806).

 
Conclusions
 

Most persons with diabetes want to be partners in the process of counseling and prefer shared treatment decision-making. Ophthalmologists should be aware of the patients' perspective in order to encourage an active and self-determined setting of individualized treatment targets.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×