June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Prevalence of Visual Impairment in Portugal: study design and initial results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rui Carneiro de Freitas
    Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
  • Cristina Freitas
    Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
  • Ricardo Leite
    Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
  • Keissy Sousa
    Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
  • José Mendes-Ferreira
    Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
  • Andreia Soares
    Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
  • Gary S Rubin
    Visual Neuroscience, UCL-Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • Amandio A Rocha-Sousa
    Department of Organs of Senses, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
  • Rui Santana
    Health Policy and Management Dept, Escola Nacional Saude Publica - University Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Antonio Filipe Macedo
    Lab. of Vision Rehabilitation, Centre/Department of Physics and Optometry, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Rui Carneiro de Freitas, None; Cristina Freitas, None; Ricardo Leite, None; Keissy Sousa, None; José Mendes-Ferreira, None; Andreia Soares, None; Gary Rubin, None; Amandio Rocha-Sousa, None; Rui Santana, None; Antonio Macedo, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2119. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rui Carneiro de Freitas, Cristina Freitas, Ricardo Leite, Keissy Sousa, José Mendes-Ferreira, Andreia Soares, Gary S Rubin, Amandio A Rocha-Sousa, Rui Santana, Antonio Filipe Macedo, ; Prevalence of Visual Impairment in Portugal: study design and initial results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2119.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Information about the prevalence of visual impairment is fundamental to define policies that deal with vision loss. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of visual impairment (VI) in the population looking for eye care in public hospitals in Portugal.

 
Methods
 

We designed an observation, cross-sectional prospective study (Prevalence and Costs of Visual Impairment in Portugal: PC-VIP study) to investigate the prevalence of VI in patients attending outpatient appointments in four public hospitals in Portugal. Hospital selected provide from general eye care (3-6 ophthalmologists) to high-specialized eye care (40+ ophthalmologists) that in total have between 120-140K hospital appointments per year. Files of patients are analysed weekly to detect patients with VI. Inclusion criteria were: visual acuity equal or worse than 0.5 (USA definition 20/40) in the better eye and/or a visual field of less than 20deg. Cases are selected by trained hospital staff and inserted in a database. Data collected included demographic information, acuity from both eyes, qualitative information about visual field (good, reduced, requires investigation), main diagnosis, secondary diagnosis and comorbidities. Diagnoses were classified according with ICD9.

 
Results
 

We have now detected 2462 cases of VI that correspond to 4 to 33 weeks of data collection. The number of weeks is variable because collection did not start simultaneously in all sites. From the number of cases detected, 58% were female, 1.9% were under 20y, 8.2% were between 20y and 50y and 89.9% were ≥50y. The mean prevalence of visual impairment was 13.6% (SD=5.6) using the USA definition and it was 7.0%(SD=4.1) using the WHO definition (acuity equal or worse than 0.3 or ~20/63). With a methodology that controls for demographics the lowest and highest estimates were calculated. Considering the USA definition, the prevalence in the general population would be in the range 0.4 -0.4% (age<40y) and 0.8-2.4% (age>=40y). Considering WHO definition, it would be 0.2-0.5% (age<40y) and 0.4-1.0% (age>=40y).

 
Conclusions
 

A hospital-based study can provide effective estimates of the prevalence of visual impairment in a population. Estimates for the country are in agreement with the expected results that can be deducted from neighbour countries and self-reported visual impairment in census 2001.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×