June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Needling Revision Outcomes Following Glaucoma Filtering Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Bianca Kizy
    Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
  • Bret A Hughes
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Aman Shukairy
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Anju Goyal
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Justin Tannir
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Mark S Juzych
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Sonia Rana
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Chaesik Kim
    Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Bianca Kizy, None; Bret Hughes, None; Aman Shukairy, None; Anju Goyal, None; Justin Tannir, None; Mark Juzych, None; Sonia Rana, None; Chaesik Kim, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2719. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bianca Kizy, Bret A Hughes, Aman Shukairy, Anju Goyal, Justin Tannir, Mark S Juzych, Sonia Rana, Chaesik Kim; Needling Revision Outcomes Following Glaucoma Filtering Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2719.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the success of needling bleb revision performed in the treatment room following failure of filtering glaucoma surgery.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of 132 patients who underwent bleb needling revision, with and without sub-conjunctival anti-proliferative, after failure of glaucoma filtering surgery. Success was defined by intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 18 with ≤ 2 pressure lowering medications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and success was determined based on percent survival at median follow up time. Failure occurred if IOP or medications exceeded criteria, or any subsequent glaucoma procedure, including repeat needling and laser procedures.

Results: Mean age for our population was 67.4 (± 13.9) years. Seventy three percent were African American. Females comprised 56% of the group. Mean pre-needling IOP was 26.2 (± 9.5) mmHg, while mean pre-needling number of medications was 2.2 (± 1.5). Seventy nine percent had primary open angle, while 11.9% had angle closure, and 4% had uveitic glaucoma. Mean post-needling IOP at 24 months was 16.5 (± 1.6) mmHg. Success was 30% at 24 months.

Conclusions: Our rate of success at 24 months was similar to previous reports. With more moderate criteria of IOP ≤ 21 with ≤ 3 medications, success rate increases to 42%. Bleb needling revision, in patients following failed glaucoma filtration surgery, may be effective in postponing or eliminating need for further invasive glaucoma surgery.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×