June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Is there an individual re-injection frequency in patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF for AMD?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Fabian Lehmann
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Horst Helbig
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Maria Andreea Gamulescu
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Fabian Lehmann, None; Horst Helbig, None; Maria Gamulescu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2849. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Fabian Lehmann, Horst Helbig, Maria Andreea Gamulescu; Is there an individual re-injection frequency in patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF for AMD?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2849.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: In intravitreal anti-VEGF-therapy for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) different treatment strategies address the wish for maximum visual acuity gain combined with minimum number of control visits. However, there is little knowledge about time-point of recurrences after initial upload-therapy in these patients. We investigated if individual differences in re-injection frequencies could be detected in our out-patient population and if these could be correlated to the AMD-subtype (occult or classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) or retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP)).

Methods: 65 eyes of 60 patients (mean age 79.7 ± 7.9 years; 36 female, 24 male) with exudative AMD who received at least 20 injections (27.9 ± 6.1 injections) of Ranibizumab were included into our retrospective study. All patients received an initial upload-therapy of three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections. Re-injection intervals (weeks) after this upload period were calculated to analyze the individual re-injection frequency. Patients with an abnormal long interval (> 1 year) between two injections were excluded from the analysis. AMD sub-types were classified by fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the baseline visit.

Results: AMD-subtyping resulted in 6 eyes with classic CNV, 47 eyes with occult CNV and 12 eyes with RAP. Mean follow-up time was 4.7 ± 1.6 years. Average visual acuity was 0.43 ± 0.24 log MAR at baseline and 0.55 ± 0.33 log MAR at the end of follow-up. Mean number of re-injections was 24.8 ± 7.2 in the classic CNV group and 25.0 ± 6.3 and 25.0 ± 5.3 in the occult CNV and RAP group, respectively. Mean interval between re-injections was 13.0 ± 1.8 weeks in the classic CNV group, 11.3 ± 2.8 weeks in the occult CNV group and 11.7 ± 1.3 in the RAP group.

Conclusions: In this retrospective study, no statistical significant difference concerning the mean re-injection interval in weeks between each AMD-subtype group could be shown. A trend towards a longer interval in patients with classic CNV might be biased by the small patient number in this group. However, this study underlines the need for continuous and potential life-long follow-up with intervals not exceeding 3 months.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×