June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Adaptation to optically induced simultaneous bifocal vision
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Carlos Dorronsoro
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Susana Marcos
    Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan, None; Carlos Dorronsoro, OEPM P201331436 (P); Susana Marcos, OEPM P201331436 (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2905. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan, Carlos Dorronsoro, Susana Marcos; Adaptation to optically induced simultaneous bifocal vision. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2905.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To evaluate in subjects neural adaptation to optically induced simultaneous vision corrections in presence of their natural aberrations.

 
Methods
 

A modified Simultaneous Vision simulator was used to produce pure bifocal images. The shift in Perceived Best Focus (PBF, i.e. amount of blur that is perceived as neutral) following adaptation to bifocal images was measured in four normal subjects. Adapting images were real bifocal images of different additions (achieved by combining two Badal channels focused for distance and near: 0.5D, 1.5D, and 3D) and proportions of near/far energy (produced by a spatial light modulator: 100%Blur (B)/0%Sharp (S), 75B/25S, 50B/50S, 25B/75S, 0B/100S). A total of 9 bifocal blur patterns, 3 pure defocus, 1 sharp, and 1 gray adaptation conditions were tested. Test images were 301 pure defocus images, simulated by convolution with 0 to 3D spherical blur of a face (subtending 2 deg at retina). The PBF was obtained with a blur detection task in a QUEST paradigm (subject responded for each test image whether it was sharp or blurred). The PBF shift was calculated as the difference between the PBF following every adapting image and the PBF following gray adaptation. All measurements were performed under paralyzed accommodation and a 5-mm pupil diameter artificial pupil.

 
Results
 

The average PBF across subjects was 0.63±0.17D following gray adaptation and 0.51±0.1D following sharp adaptation (natural viewing), with no statistically significant differences (p=0.08) between these conditions. A high statistical significant correlation between the blur level of the adapting images and the shift in PBF (r=0.77, p=0.003). The largest shift in PBF occurred following adaptation to pure defocus (100B/0S: 0.32D±0.02D) and to the bifocal pattern with the largest blur component (75B/25S: 0.19D± 0.05D) for 3 D addition. Adaptation to a 50B/50S bifocal pattern produced the largest PBF shift (0.13D± 0.05D) for a 1.5 D addition. None except one subject experienced significant after-effects following adaptation to25B/75S bifocal pattern.

 
Conclusions
 

Our results suggest that subjects can adapt, to a certain extent, to the image degradation produced by simultaneous vision pattern, particularly to patterns with 50%Near/50%Far or 75%/25%-Near or Far. A simultaneous vision simulator is a useful tool to assess potential adaptation effects to bifocal corrections.  

 
Figure 1: Adaptation to optical simultaneous vision blur
 
Figure 1: Adaptation to optical simultaneous vision blur

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×