June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Rifle marksmanship performance following wavefront-guided (WFG) vs. wavefront-optimized (WFO) refractive surgeries
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Denise S Ryan
    Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Rose Kristine Sia
    Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Richard Stutzman
    Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
  • Joseph F Pasternak
    Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
  • Lamarr Peppers
    Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Jennifer B Eaddy
    Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Lorie A Logan
    Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Bruce Rivers
    Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA
  • Kraig S Bower
    Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Denise Ryan, None; Rose Sia, None; Richard Stutzman, None; Joseph Pasternak, None; Lamarr Peppers, None; Jennifer Eaddy, None; Lorie Logan, None; Bruce Rivers, None; Kraig Bower, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3944. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Denise S Ryan, Rose Kristine Sia, Richard Stutzman, Joseph F Pasternak, Lamarr Peppers, Jennifer B Eaddy, Lorie A Logan, Bruce Rivers, Kraig S Bower; Rifle marksmanship performance following wavefront-guided (WFG) vs. wavefront-optimized (WFO) refractive surgeries. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3944.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To compare rifle marksmanship performance after WFG vs. WFO refractive surgeries.

Methods: In this prospective study, 55 myopic U.S. military service members with mean age 30.0 ±6.7 years and mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent -3.77 ±1.43 diopters undergoing either PRK or LASIK were randomized to receive either WFG (VISX CustomVue STAR S4 IR) or WFO (Wavelight Allegretto Wave EyeQ excimer laser systems) treatment. Marksmanship performance was evaluated preoperatively and at 6 weeks (W) and 6 months (M) postoperatively. Participants were asked to fire an M16-A4 rifle under three conditions: iron sight under low light (approximately 1 cd/m2); night vision goggle (NVG); and forward-looking infrared (FLIR) thermal sight under “starlight” (approximately 0.001 cd/m2). Pre- and postoperative firing range scores were compared between treatment groups at each time point. Four groups (WFG PRK, n=13; WFG LASIK, n=14; WFO PRK, n=14; and WFO LASIK, n=14) were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. For multiple comparison, a Bonferroni adjusted p-value<0.02 was considered statistically significant.

Results: There was no significant difference in firing scores among the treatment groups preoperatively except when using FLIR thermal sight (P=0.01). Post-hoc analysis revealed firing scores when using FLIR thermal sight in WFG PRK group was significantly higher than that in WFG LASIK group (P=0.017), preoperatively. At 6W postoperatively, there was a significant difference in firing scores using iron sight among the groups (P<0.01) but not in firing scores using NVG and FLIR thermal sight. Further analysis revealed firing scores using iron sight in WFG PRK and WFO PRK groups were significantly higher than that in WFG LASIK group (P=0.018 and P=0.015, respectively) 6W postoperatively. The firing scores using iron sight, NVG and FLIR were comparable for all groups at 6M postoperatively.

Conclusions: WFG and WFO PRK may offer a short-term advantage over WFG LASIK in low light firing performance. Overall, using WFG or WFO treatment in either PRK or LASIK results in comparable rifle marksmanship performance in U.S. soldiers after surgery. Vision enhancers, like NVG and FLIR thermal sight, in rifle marksmanship performance are not hampered by refractive surgery.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×