June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Complementarity of Binocular Nerve Fiber Layer Loss on Optical Coherence Tomography in Bilateral Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Amy Schnegg
    Rosenberg School of Optometry, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX
  • William Eric Sponsel
    Rosenberg School of Optometry, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • Matthew Aaron Reilly
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • Ted Maddess
    ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Acton, ACT, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Amy Schnegg, None; William Sponsel, None; Matthew Reilly, None; Ted Maddess, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 4565. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amy Schnegg, William Eric Sponsel, Matthew Aaron Reilly, Ted Maddess; Complementarity of Binocular Nerve Fiber Layer Loss on Optical Coherence Tomography in Bilateral Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):4565.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To determine if an anatomical relationship exists in the preservation of visual function in bilateral glaucoma using clinical OCT paired RNFL thickness values.

 
Methods
 

Paired sets of clinical OCT RNFL thickness data from Optovue's RTVue were taken from 13 patients with bilateral glaucoma ranging from mild to severe FDT visual field loss. Only the superior temporal (ST), superior nasal (SN), inferior temporal (IT) and inferior nasal (IN) sectors were used due to the temporal sector values representing very tight and complex nerve fiber bundles compared to their nasal sector complements. The RNFL thickness data from each sector was normalized against per-sector average healthy RNFL thickness (i.e. ST 140 µm, SN 120 µm, IT 150 µm, IN 140 µm). Complementary sectors (ST OD/SN OS, SN OD/ST OS, IT OD/IN OS, and IN OD/IT OS) were paired and the better of the two determined as binocular RNFL thickness score OU. The four sector values for OD, OS, and OU were averaged to generate a mean RNFL thickness score for each of the 13 patient’s OD, OS and OU. A paired t test of the mean RNFL thickness scores was used to determine the significance of the difference between OD/OS and monocular/binocular score.

 
Results
 

Mean (+/- standard error) RNFL thickness for OD, OS, and OU were respectively 86.3+/-18.3 um, 91.1+/-22.3 um, and 98.2+/-20.9 um. RNFL thickness was not significantly different between OD and OS (p=0.38) but OD and OS were both significantly lower than OU (p=0.006 and p=0.004, respectively). Figure 2

 
Conclusions
 

The bilateral RNFL thickness score being significantly higher than the monocular scores suggests that the combined anatomical preservation of RNFL thickness does occur in order to preserve visual function in the binocular field. Similarly to a prior oral presentation (Sponsel et al., ARVO 2013 E-abstract 54:4939) of a larger set of clinical data from Carl Zeiss Cirrus OCT RNFL thickness values from patients with severe Humphrey Visual Field loss (Figure 1), our Optovue data set has the similar finding of higher normalized RNFL thickness values binocularly even on a small data set of mild and moderate FDT visual field loss patients. Both OCT data sets having sectors with diffuse RNFL representation even further suggests the significance of binocular anatomical preservation of visual function, if able to study focal paired anatomical complements.  

 

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×