June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Application of Normative Values to Improve Macular Asymmetry Analysis in Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Muhammed Alluwimi
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • Brett King
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • William H Swanson
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Muhammed Alluwimi, None; Brett King, None; William Swanson, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C), Heidelberg Engineering (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5276. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Muhammed Alluwimi, Brett King, William H Swanson; Application of Normative Values to Improve Macular Asymmetry Analysis in Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5276.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Asymmetry analysis of macular thickness has been introduced to clinical practice for evaluating damage to the macular region, but without normative values. We previously derived normative values for macular asymmetry, and found high between-subject variability in control subjects which limits capability to detect early macular damage. We have demonstrated that this variation can be reduced by focusing on specific regions closer to the fovea. Here we evaluate the potential of asymmetry analysis in detecting macular damage in patients with glaucoma.

 
Methods
 

Twenty patients with glaucomatous visual field (24-2) defects (ages 40 to 85 years) and 30 age-similar controls were recruited from a longitudinal glaucoma study. Subjects were imaged with Spectralis OCT (V 5.4, Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH) using the posterior pole protocol. A 64-cell grid is superimposed on a 24°×24° area of the macula, and was manually adjusted to be centered on the fovea; the central line of this grid was oriented in the same direction as the foveal-disc angle. We demarcated 3 zones per hemifield within the central ±8°, where we had found the lowest variability. Asymmetry was calculated as the difference between the average thicknesses of a superior zone and the corresponding inferior zone. In order to validate our findings, high-density scans were used with 10 of the 20 patients to derive en face images of the RNFL bundles at different distances from the inner limiting membrane.

 
Results
 

Out of 180 zones in the control subjects, 2 zones were flagged at p < 0.05, and one zone at p < 0.01, but none of 30 controls were flagged with 2 contiguous zones. For patients, asymmetry analysis showed 15 of 20 patients with at least 2 contiguous zones at p < 0.05. RNFL damage seen in en face images confirmed damage in the macular zones flagged by the asymmetry analysis.

 
Conclusions
 

By focusing on the central ±8°, we improved the capability of the asymmetry analysis to detect macular thickness reduction in patients with glaucoma. Our results were confirmed with en face images of the RNFL bundles.  

 
Corresponding glaucomatous damage was seen in the macular asymmetry plot, en face image and visual field (24-2 and 10-2) gray scale.
 
Corresponding glaucomatous damage was seen in the macular asymmetry plot, en face image and visual field (24-2 and 10-2) gray scale.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×