June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
The spatial and temporal contributions of melanopsin to mouse vision
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Annette E Allen
    Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Riccardo Storchi
    Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Daniel H Elijah
    Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Franck P Martial
    Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Robert J Lucas
    Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Annette Allen, None; Riccardo Storchi, None; Daniel Elijah, None; Franck Martial, None; Robert Lucas, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5866. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Annette E Allen, Riccardo Storchi, Daniel H Elijah, Franck P Martial, Robert J Lucas; The spatial and temporal contributions of melanopsin to mouse vision. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5866.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The emerging role of melanopsin and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in perceptual vision demands a more quantitative description of melanopsin’s input to these pathways in visually intact animals. Particularly lacking is a description of the spatial and temporal information conveyed by ipRGCs that arises exclusively from melanopsin’s photon capture, and what functional impact this may have on image forming vision.

Methods: We have modified a commercially available projection system so that each of the R, G and B channels is instead a combination of up to five, independently controlled wavelengths (λmax 405, 455, 525, 561, 630nm). This allows us to present patterned stimuli that only present spatial/temporal contrast for particular photopigments. We have used multi-channel recording electrodes to record light-evoked activity in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) of urethane anaesthetised Opn1mwR mice; these mice display a long-wavelength shifted spectral sensitivity of green cones, which allows us to achieve maximal contrast for each photopigment.

Results: We have recorded evoked activity in the dLGN in response to spatially structured stimuli, that originate from melanopsin in isolation (49% Michelson contrast); rod opsin & cone opsins (33% Michelson contrast); or melanopsin, rod and cone opsins (49% and 33%, respectively). We have measured the spatial receptive fields in each of these conditions; when measurable, isolated melanopsin receptive fields tend to be large, extending beyond the size of rod/cone driven receptive fields recorded in the same dLGN cell. The temporal properties of these responses are also distinct from rod/cone evoked responses. Moreover, comparisons of the responses evoked by rod/cone stimuli presented with or without concurrent melanopsin contrast reveal a defined input of melanopsin that is quite distinct from rod and cone-evoked responses.

Conclusions: Visual responses arising exclusively with melanopsin are detectible at the level of the dLGN at relatively modest contrasts, and on a physiologically relevant spatial and temporal scale. Although these signals are outside the range required for high spatiotemporal acuity vision, they instead occupy a distinct sensory niche that may still be useful for pattern vision.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×