June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Evaluation of optical coherence tomography for measuring anterior chamber inflammation in a rabbit model of uveitis.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Amit Sharma
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Brent A Bell
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Rose M DiCicco
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Nathaniel Sears
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Yuankai Tao
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Alex Yuan
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Sunil K Srivastava
    Opthalmic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Amit Sharma, None; Brent Bell, None; Rose DiCicco, None; Nathaniel Sears, None; Yuankai Tao, None; Alex Yuan, None; Sunil Srivastava, Bausch and Lomb (C), Bioptigen (P), Clearside (C), Optos (C), Regeneron (C), Santen (C), Synergetics (P), Zeiss (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 6186. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amit Sharma, Brent A Bell, Rose M DiCicco, Nathaniel Sears, Yuankai Tao, Alex Yuan, Sunil K Srivastava; Evaluation of optical coherence tomography for measuring anterior chamber inflammation in a rabbit model of uveitis.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):6186.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Anterior uveitis is an inflammatory disease of the eye which can lead to blindness. Currently, clinicians quantify anterior chamber inflammation using slit lamp biomicroscopy according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) model. Unfortunately, this method is fraught with variability. To reduce this inconsistency, we previously evaluated an automated method of quantitating cellular activity using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SDOCT) in humans. In this study we validate this technique in an in vivo rabbit model.

 
Methods
 

Anterior uveitis was induced by intracameral injection of Myobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra antigen in pre-immunized adult rabbits. Anterior segment OCT of each rabbit was performed and 3mm x 3mm cube scans were obtained. Hyper-reflective specks were counted by evaluating each B-scan image and the density of these specks was determined. Clinical grading of inflammation was also recorded according to SUN by 2 independent graders. Both SDOCT measurements and SUN grading were compared with the actual cell density, determined by anterior chamber sampling using a Nageotte hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific, Horsham PA).

 
Results
 

Manual cytometry consistently yielded higher cell density counts compared with SDOCT measurements (figure 1). Cells of various sizes were found on manual cytometry, but cell clumps were rare. Both SDOCT and SUN grading correlated with manual cytometry (figures 1 and 2). However, SDOCT was better at resolving differences in cell density above ~150 cells/microliter. A reduction from 256 cells/microliter to 215.2 cells/microliter (16% reduction) was undetectable by SUN grading but resulted in a large reduction in SDOCT measured cell activity.

 
Conclusions
 

Our data suggests SDOCT may be a noninvasive method to objectively grade anterior chamber inflammation. Manual cytometry correlated with SDOCT counts, although the correlation is not 1:1. Thus, the hyper-reflective specks seen on OCT do not represent single cells. Faster and higher resolution imaging may be necessary to improve SDOCT measurement, especially at lower levels of inflammation.  

 
Fig.1: Plot of cell density determined by manual cytometry vs SDOCT.
 
Fig.1: Plot of cell density determined by manual cytometry vs SDOCT.
 
 
Fig.2: Plot of cell density determined by manual cytometry vs SUN grading (average of two graders).
 
Fig.2: Plot of cell density determined by manual cytometry vs SUN grading (average of two graders).

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×