March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Fixation Behavior Characteristics In Different Retinal Diseases
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Carmela Carnevale
    UOC B Ophthalmology,
    University La Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Serena Salvatore
    Ophthalmology,
    University La Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Yu-hui Huang
    Ophthalmology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
  • Pasquale Plateroti
    Ophthalmology, University La Sapienza of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Italy
  • Serena Fragiotta
    University La Sapienza of Rome, Latina, Italy
  • Roberto Grenga
    UOC B Ophthalmology,
    University La Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Carmela Carnevale, None; Serena Salvatore, None; Yu-hui Huang, None; Pasquale Plateroti, None; Serena Fragiotta, None; Roberto Grenga, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 809. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carmela Carnevale, Serena Salvatore, Yu-hui Huang, Pasquale Plateroti, Serena Fragiotta, Roberto Grenga; Fixation Behavior Characteristics In Different Retinal Diseases. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):809.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate fixation behavior in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) using the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Technologies,Italy).

Methods: : Thirty healthy people (group A), 26 people with RP (group B), and 28 people with DR (group C) were assessed. Groups were paired by age and gender. BCVA, retinal sensitivity within central 2 and 4 degrees were evaluated. Fixation score, central 2 and 4 degrees values and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) were obtained from the MP-1. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test. Values < 0.05 were considered significant. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for comparisons.

Results: : Fixation within the 2° diameter circle was 93.53±5.97% for group A, 82.00±23.31 for group B (p<0.05), and 78.13±21.61 for group C (p<0.05). Fixation within the 4° diameter circle was 97.93±2.99% for group A, 93.00±14.42 for group B (0.11) and 95.13±4.91 for groups C (0.6). Retinal sensitivity within the 2°was 17.66±2.37dB for group A, 14.47±5.06 dB for group B (0.13), and 14.54±6.06 for group C (0.2). Retinal sensitivity within the 4° was 18.05±1.41dB for group A, 14.55±4.95 for group B (0.7), and 15.69±4.23 for group C (0.4). BCEA which contained 99% fixation points was 11.11±10.55 degree sq. for group A, 20.91±33.28for group B (0.002), and 16.25±14.37for group C (0.001). BCVA was 0 ±0.96,0 ±1.14, and 0±0.94 logMAR respectively. A significant correlation was found between BCVA and BCEA (r= 0.99) for all groups.

Conclusions: : Although a significant difference was found between fixation behavior within the 2° diameter circles in all groups, the only fixation parameter that correlated with BCVA was BCEA, which could differentiate subtle changes in macular function. Thus, we recommend BCEA to be used to quantify fixation stability when using MP-1.

Keywords: low vision • retinal degenerations: hereditary • diabetic retinopathy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×