March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Assessment of Basic Eye Function Prior to Requesting Ophthalmology Consultation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ryan K. Wong
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • John J. Huang
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Ryan K. Wong, None; John J. Huang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 1400. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ryan K. Wong, John J. Huang; Assessment of Basic Eye Function Prior to Requesting Ophthalmology Consultation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):1400.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Exposure to ophthalmology is limited in medical schools and many post-graduate training programs such as primary care and pediatric residencies. As a result many non-ophthalmologist physicians may be inadequately trained in the initial management or appropriate referral of ophthalmic disease. The purpose of this study was to characterize the rate and accuracy of basic ophthalmic assessment performed by the emergency department or inpatient services that requested ophthalmology consultation in a large teaching hospital.

Methods: : All ophthalmology housestaff at Yale New Haven Hospital, who are responsible for initial evaluation of consultations, were asked to inquire about the primary service’s (emergency department or inpatient service) assessment of visual acuity (VA), extraocular movement (EOM), and pupillary function. A review of records from September 2010 to February 2011 was then performed to indentify charts that had documented this information. The primary service’s assessment of VA was compared to that performed by the ophthalmology service.

Results: : Of 613 emergency department and inpatient consultations performed by the ophthalmology service, 205 (33%) had documentation of the primary service’s initial ophthalmic assessment of VA, EOM, and pupillary exam. Of these 205 consultation requests 72 (35%) had assessed VA, 140 (68%) assessed EOM, and 148 (72%) assessed pupillary function prior to calling the ophthalmology service. Of the 72 cases that had assessed VA, 34 (47%) were qualitative measurements such as "intact" or "blurry." Of the 38 cases that quantitatively assessed VA, 23 (61%) had assessments that were worse than the VA eventually measured by the ophthalmology service.

Conclusions: : Many emergency department and inpatient services do not assess VA, EOM, or pupillary function prior to requesting ophthalmology consultation. Additionally, the reported VA is often worse than that measured by the ophthalmology service. These findings may have important implications on the appropriate utilization of limited medical resources. Furthermore, the findings suggest possible areas of improvement in medical school and non-ophthalmology residency education.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.