March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Combining Central Corneal Thickness And Corneal Hysteresis To Differentiate Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From Ocular Hypertension
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michael Sullivan-Mee
    Optometry, Albuquerque VA Med Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Denise Pensyl
    Optometry, Albuquerque VA Med Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Kathy Halverson
    Optometry, Albuquerque VA Med Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Melynda Torres
    Optometry, Albuquerque VA Med Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Michael Sullivan-Mee, None; Denise Pensyl, None; Kathy Halverson, None; Melynda Torres, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 2807. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael Sullivan-Mee, Denise Pensyl, Kathy Halverson, Melynda Torres; Combining Central Corneal Thickness And Corneal Hysteresis To Differentiate Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From Ocular Hypertension. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):2807.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To examine differences in corneal hysteresis values in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH) after segregating the eyes into thin, intermediate and thick central corneal thickness (CCT) subgroups.

 
Methods:
 

Consecutive Albuquerque VA Medical Center eye clinic patients with a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH) were studied. We obtained study data with bi-directional air-jet tonometry (ORA), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and ultrasound pachymetry. Correlational, regression, and t-test analyses were conducted before and after subjects were divided into CCT tertiles (thin, intermediate, thick subgroups).

 
Results:
 

One hundred sixty-nine eyes of 169 subjects were included in this study; eighty-one met the criteria for POAG diagnosis and eighty-eight met the criteria for OH diagnosis. For the total sample, CH was directly correlated with CCT (r=0.44, p<0.001), and inversely correlated with intraocular pressure (r=-0.17, p=0.03 for GAT and r=-0.21, p=0.01 for DCT). CH was significantly lower in POAG eyes compared to OH eyes within the total sample and within each CCT subgroup. In multivariate regression analyses, CH was the only factor that differentiated POAG from OH within all three CCT subgroups.

 
Conclusions:
 

While CH increased with increasing CCT, mean CH in POAG remained lower than mean CH in OH within each CCT subgroup. This finding suggests that the clinical utility of CH for differentiating POAG from OH may be enhanced by considering CCT status.  

 
Keywords: cornea: clinical science • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×