March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Intracameral Tying-off Of Glaucoma Drainage Device Tubes As A Management Of Hypotony Following GDD Implant Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tina Parmar
    Ophthalmology, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Peter Cikatricis
    Ophthalmology, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Nikolaos Mavrakanas
    Ophthalmology, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Velota Sung
    Ophthalmology, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Tina Parmar, None; Peter Cikatricis, None; Nikolaos Mavrakanas, None; Velota Sung, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3716. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tina Parmar, Peter Cikatricis, Nikolaos Mavrakanas, Velota Sung; Intracameral Tying-off Of Glaucoma Drainage Device Tubes As A Management Of Hypotony Following GDD Implant Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3716.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To describe safety and efficacy of tying-off of Glaucoma Drainage Devices (GDDs) as a management of secondary hypotony. We describe a particular type of surgical management of hypotony. According to our knowledge this is the first such description in published literature.

Methods: : Retrospective case review of all patients having undergone this procedure between January'07 and December'10 in one tertiary centre. 22 eyes of 21 patients (13.7% of total tube surgery), mean age was 29.0 years (2-72; 20.6), males:females-11:10. Mean follow-up was 34.6 months (12.2).

Results: : 50% were uveitic glaucoma cases. The types of GDDs were 6, 11 and 5 for Molteno, Baerveldt 250 and Baerveldt 350 respectively. Average pre-op IOP was 4.4mmHg (4.7). At day 1, mean IOP increased to 8.8mmHg (7.2) and mean final IOP was 10.0mmHg (5.4). Qualified and unqualified success, defined as resolution of hypotony and complications (IOP 6-22mmHg) with/without medication was 13.6% and 36.4% respectively. Visual acuity (LogMAR) increased in 12 eyes, was unchanged in 4 and decreased in 6 eyes when comparing pre-operative and final VA. Mean pre-operative VA was 1.3 (0.9) and mean final VA was 1.1 (1.2). The commonest complication was uncontrolled IOP increase and 4 patients required either untying of tube or laser suture lysis. Others included persistent hypotony, choroidal/retinal detachments, endophthalmitis or phthisis (8 eyes).

Conclusions: : Tying-off of GDDs is an effective measure to manage hypotony, including in paediatric patients.

Keywords: intraocular pressure • outflow: trabecular meshwork 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×