March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison Of Self-reported Distance- And Near-vision Related Quality Of Life With Best Corrected Visual Acuity Outcome After Intravitreal Anti-vegf Therapy For Age Related Macular Degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Daniela Claessens
    Gemeinschaftspraxis Lindenthal, Cologne, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Daniela Claessens, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 3804. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniela Claessens; Comparison Of Self-reported Distance- And Near-vision Related Quality Of Life With Best Corrected Visual Acuity Outcome After Intravitreal Anti-vegf Therapy For Age Related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):3804.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is easy to perform and to measure. The study was performed to give an impression how valid BCVA is to reflect visual performance and vision-related quality of life in patients with age related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: : A retrospective cross sectional study was performed comparing visual outcome (as measured by BCVA) after anti-VEGF therapy for AMD with self reported vision related quality of life (measured with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) focussing on subscales "near vision" and "distance vision" -both consisting of 3 questions respectively). 200 customers of a german health insurance company were asked to take part in the study, the response rate was 38.5%.Visual outcome was categorized in 2 groups: Group BS (n=40) if BCVA was better or stabilized after injections, group W (n=36) if BCVA was worse after injections. Average (AV) and median for subscales "distance vision" and "near vision" were calculated. To compare the subscale results in both groups, average mean difference, standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value were calculated by t-test.

Results: : Group BS reached better results (AV 54,88/ SD26,95) in subscale "near vision" than group W (AV 49,03/ SD 26,65):the difference was not statistically significant but right-leaning CI suggested a relevant difference between both groups.In subscale "distance vision", however, group W revealed higher scores (AV 59,72/ SD 24,94) than group BS (AV 56,98/ SD 25,34).

Conclusions: : Participants with stabilized or ameliorated BCVA did not outperform in both subscales of patient reported outcomes (PRO) but showed higher scores only in subscale "near vision". Although handy and pragmatic, BCVA does not seem to adequately reflect vision related quality of life in patients after intravitreal injection therapy for age related macular degeneration. Confounders, effect modifiers, power, bias, internal and external validity and clinical implication are discussed.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • quality of life • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×