March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure by Tonopen vs Palpation after Cataract Extraction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jeffery C. Hinson, Jr.
    Ophthalmology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Jeffery C. Hinson, Jr., None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 6671. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jeffery C. Hinson, Jr.; Comparison of Intraocular Pressure by Tonopen vs Palpation after Cataract Extraction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):6671.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the accuracy cataract surgeons exhibit when determining intraocular pressure after performing phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation by comparing their estimation of pressure with direct palpation versus the use of a tonopen.

Methods: : The methods performed in the study included two cataract surgeons, one attending and one senior resident, who would estimate the intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation via direct palpation; a 30 gauge cannula, attached to a TB syringe with pressure placed on the sclera after incision sites were hydrated and found to be water tight, was used. Next, a tonopen, Reichert XI model, was calibrated and used to determine the intraocular pressure with a +-5% error. The results were recorded by an OR nurse and were not shared with the individual cataract surgeons.

Results: : Based upon the data collected, there was no signficant difference between the comparison of intraocular pressure determination between the resident estimation and tonopen measurements. There was also no statistical difference between the comparison of intraocular pressure determination between attending estimation and tonopen measurements. However, there was a statistical difference between the resident's and the attending's intraocular pressure estimations. Results were determined using a paired t-test with a p value = <.05 and a n=50.

Conclusions: : Based upon this study, cataract surgeons are accurate in determining intraocular pressure via palpation with a 30 gauge cannula on a TB syringe when compared to the use of a tonopen.

Keywords: cataract • intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×