April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Efficacy of Cylindrical Correction in Wavefront-guided Advanced Surface Ablation with Iris Registration for Myopic Astigmatism
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • W. Jackson
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • S. V. Kulkarni
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • G. Mintsioulis
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • S. E. J. Taylor
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • M. D. Lafontaine
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • R. Munger
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  W. Jackson, AMO, C; AMO, R; S.V. Kulkarni, None; G. Mintsioulis, None; S.E.J. Taylor, None; M.D. Lafontaine, None; R. Munger, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 562. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      W. Jackson, S. V. Kulkarni, G. Mintsioulis, S. E. J. Taylor, M. D. Lafontaine, R. Munger; Efficacy of Cylindrical Correction in Wavefront-guided Advanced Surface Ablation with Iris Registration for Myopic Astigmatism. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):562.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To assess the efficacy of cylindrical correction in Wavefront-guided Advanced Surface Ablation (WF-ASA) with iris registration (IR) in patients with myopic astigmatism.

Methods: : 240 eyes with myopia, astigmatism and wavefront (WF) aberrations undergoing WF-ASA with IR (STAR S4 IRTM, AMO) were retrospectively analyzed. WF (WaveScan WaveFrontTM, AMO) and manifest refractions were obtained 1 week before and 3 months after WF-ASA. Reduction in astigmatic amplitude (RAA = Postop cyl - Preop cyl) and degree of achieved cylindrical correction (ACC = amplitude and angle) by vector analysis was used to assess efficacy of treatment.

Results: : Preoperative mean spherical refraction by WF and manifest was alike -4.35D ±2.0D (-0.25 to -8.5D) but WF mean astigmatism 0.70±0.50 D (0.06 to 2.49D) was significantly higher than manifest (0.56±0.53 D) P<0.05. At 3 months, mean RAA by WF refraction (0.33±0.44D) was significantly lower than mean RAA by manifest refraction (0.45±0.58D) P=0.001. However, ACC by vector analysis showed comparable amplitudes for WF (0.52±0.43) and manifest (0.54±0.54D) refractions. Treatment axis and astigmatic axis differed significantly (P<0.01) with alignment errors showing significant difference between WF (13.0±12.1°) and manifest (2.2±7.4°) refraction (P<0.001).There was no correlation between alignment error and mean preop cylinder. At least 0.25D increase in astigmatism was observed in a small group (WF=13, manifest=18 eyes of which 7 and 10 eyes respectively had an increase of ≥0.50D). Astigmatism of ≥0.25D was induced in 10 of the 15 eyes without any manifest preop astigmatism.

Conclusions: : Overall, WF-ASA with IR is an effective and safe treatment for myopic astigmatism. In our study, ACC matches the intended correction closely (<0.2D difference on average), however significant alignment error reduced the efficacy of the reduction in astigmatism.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • refractive surgery: PRK • astigmatism 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×