May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
A Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by Inspection and Pachymetry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. K. Shah
    Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
    Ophthalmology, Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado
  • D. MacKenzie
    Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
  • M. Kahook
    Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
  • A. Ciardella
    Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
    Ophthalmology, Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado
  • N. Faberowski
    Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
    Ophthalmology, Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships A.K. Shah, None; D. MacKenzie, None; M. Kahook, None; A. Ciardella, None; N. Faberowski, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1260. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. K. Shah, D. MacKenzie, M. Kahook, A. Ciardella, N. Faberowski; A Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by Inspection and Pachymetry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1260.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To compare the estimated central corneal thickness (CCT) determined by inspection with the slit lamp by two independent examiners (resident physician [Examiner A] and attending physician [Examiner B]) to the actual measurement obtained by ultrasound (pachymetry).

Methods:: Thirty eyes of 15 glaucoma suspect patients were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. CCT was estimated by inspection by 2 examiners independent of each other, and values were recorded numerically in microns. A measurement of CCT was then performed with ultrasound pachymetry by both examiners independently. The estimated measurements of each examiner were compared to the ultrasound measurements and to each other.

Results:: Mean age of the patients was 48.6 +/- 20.8 years, and average corneal thickness by pachymetry in the study population was 537.8 +/- 48.0 microns (range 436-599 microns). There was no statistical difference between pachymetry measurements obtained by the two examiners. The mean difference between the estimated and measured CCT was 26.0 +/- 17.8 and 25.5 +/- 14.0 microns for Examiners A and B, respectively. The paired student's t-test was used to compare the measurements obtained by inspection with the objective values obtained by pachymetry for each of the two examiners, and this analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences (p=0.52 and 0.97 for Examiners A and B, respectively). Furthermore, there was very minimal interexaminer variation of CCT estimates.

Conclusions:: CCT has been shown to be an important clinical factor in determining risk level for future glaucoma development in some glaucoma suspect patients. Careful inspection of the cornea can accurately estimate the central corneal thickness as obtained by pachymetry and should be incorporated into the routine ocular examination.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • detection • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×