May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Comparison of Automated Digital Retinal Images, ETDRS 35mm 7-Standard Field Color Stereoscopic Retinal Photography and Retinal Examination for Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Prakash
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • J. D. Cavallerano
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • T. J. Murtha
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • J. K. Sun
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • A. C. Clermont
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • R. N. Hamam
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • S. E. Bursell
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • L. P. Aiello
    Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Dept. of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships M. Prakash, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; J.D. Cavallerano, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; T.J. Murtha, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; J.K. Sun, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; A.C. Clermont, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; R.N. Hamam, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; S.E. Bursell, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F; L.P. Aiello, Automated Retina Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ), F.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1396. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Prakash, J. D. Cavallerano, T. J. Murtha, J. K. Sun, A. C. Clermont, R. N. Hamam, S. E. Bursell, L. P. Aiello; Comparison of Automated Digital Retinal Images, ETDRS 35mm 7-Standard Field Color Stereoscopic Retinal Photography and Retinal Examination for Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1396.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: ETDRS protocol 7-standard field 35 mm color stereoscopic retinal photos (ETDRS photos) are the standard for assessing diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity. Acquisition of suitable ETDRS photos requires substantial experience, technical skill, and specific certification for clinical trials. The Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS, Prescott, AZ) acquires 7, pseudo-color stereoscopic digital images approximating the ETDRS photo fields by a semi-automated process that requires only a technician to operate. We compared correlation between ETDRS photos, ARIS photos and clinical exam in 141 eyes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods:: All evaluations were fully masked. Following clinical exam with a retinal specialist to determine DR level, all patients were imaged using both the ARIS and ETDRS protocols. One reader graded all ARIS images and a different reader graded all ETDRS photos.

Results:: 141 eyes of 71 pts with DM were evaluated. Mean age was 50 years (range 19-75). Clinical exam revealed no DR in 15%, mild NPDR in 30%, moderate NPDR in 23%, severe NPDR in 1%, PDR in 4%, PDR with high-risk characteristics in 6%, and quiescent PDR in 21% of eyes. To date, ARIS images from 32 patients (45%) and ETDRS photos from 19 patients (27%) have been graded. Ungradable images occurred 3 (4.7%) and 0 times for ARIS and ETDRS photos, respectively. Exact agreement of retinopathy severity between ARIS and clinical exam was 77.6% (k=0.65, p<0.001), comparing favorably with ETDRS photo agreement with clinical exam of 65.8% (k=0.28, p=0.035). ARIS and ETDRS photos were within 1 retinopathy severity level of clinical exam in 91.6% and 100%, respectively. Exact agreement between ETDRS photos and ARIS occurred in 78.9% (k=0.48, p<0.001) and agreement within 1 level occurred in 100%. ARIS was graded as more severe than ETDRS photos in 3 eyes and as less severe in 4 eyes.

Conclusions:: ARIS automated digital images compare favorably with both clinical exam and ETDRS protocol 7-standard field photography, suggesting that automated digital imaging may prove useful in evaluation of retinopathy severity. Findings from the entire cohort analyzed by retinopathy severity level and specific lesion will also be presented.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • diabetic retinopathy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×