May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Can Jaeger Numbers Be Standardized
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Colenbrander
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Res Inst, Novato, California
  • P. Runge
    Ophthalmology, University of South Florida, Sarasota, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships A. Colenbrander, None; P. Runge, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 3563. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Colenbrander, P. Runge; Can Jaeger Numbers Be Standardized. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):3563. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To determine whether the wide variety of font sizes used on current cards can be standardized.

 
Methods:
 

After collecting 20 samples of current Jaeger cards, the print sizes used were measured, rounded and plotted against a logarithmic scale in M-units.

 
Results:
 

The table shows the range of M sizes found for each J-number.  

 
Conclusions:
 

After 152 years, the variability among Jaeger cards is baffling. All current cards use print sizes that are larger than Jaeger’s original (starred numbers). New Jaeger cards based on the original sizes would show worse performance than current cards and might not be widely accepted. Confusion would persist between the new and the currently used cards.The only basis for a verifiable standard remains the use of M-units, based on Snellen’s mathematical definition of visual angle (1862), which applies to near as well as to distance measurements.#

 
Keywords: reading • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×