May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Surveillance of Contact Lens Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia and New Zealand: Multi-Source Case-Capture and Cost-Effectiveness
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L. J. Keay
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • K. Edwards
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Kensington, Australia
  • G. Brian
    International Centre for Eyecare Education, Kensington, Australia
  • F. Stapleton
    Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships L.J. Keay, None; K. Edwards, None; G. Brian, None; F. Stapleton, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support NHMRC Post-Graduate Scholarship, Australian Government via the Cooperative Research Centres Program, Institute for Eye Research and CIBA Vision
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 4290. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L. J. Keay, K. Edwards, G. Brian, F. Stapleton; Surveillance of Contact Lens Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia and New Zealand: Multi-Source Case-Capture and Cost-Effectiveness. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4290.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To evaluate a multi-source surveillance system used in a 12-month study of contact lens related microbial keratitis in Australia and New Zealand.

Methods:: All practising ophthalmologists and optometrists were surveyed on 6 occasions over 12-months via post or the Internet. Participation was defined as reporting at least once during the study period and the response rates represented those who responded on all six occasions. Cases were also detected through hospital audit. All ophthalmologists and a sub-group of optometrists were contacted by phone to elicit a response (active surveillance). The utilisation and cost-effectiveness of active surveillance were compared to reports received via the post or the Internet. Case ascertainment and cost-effectiveness were compared for different sources of case capture.

Results:: The rate of participation for ophthalmologists was 95.8% (711/742) and 88.5% (657/742) responded for all reporting periods. Active surveillance was required for 63% (416/661) of responses in New Zealand (NZ) and 73% (59/81) in Australia (AU) at AUD23.14 per practitioner. Internet reporting was more widely used in New Zealand (NZ: 31% vs AU:17%, p=0.006) and was the most cost effective mode of reporting (AUD1.43 per practitioner). Postal reporting (AUD; AU:3.54,NZ:9.84 per practitioner) was under-utilised (3% of responses). Average start up costs comprised 50% of study costs followed by active follow-up (42%), postal (6%) and Internet reporting (2%). Ophthalmologists (50.4%, 144/286 of cases) were the most cost-effective source of cases, followed by hospital audit (24.5%, 70/286) and optometry (25.1%, 72/286). Duplicate reporting occurred in 13% (37/286) of cases.

Conclusions:: High response rates were obtained by substantial resource commitment to active follow-up. Internet reporting was widely used and was cost-effective. Hospital audit and supplementary reporting by optometry were used for the first time in a surveillance study of contact lens related microbial keratitis, and contributed significantly to case capture.

Keywords: clinical research methodology • keratitis 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×