May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
VitagelTM vs. TisseelTM Tissue Adhesives in Ocular Surface Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. E. McChesney
    Ophthalmology, US Air Force, Lackland AFB, Texas
  • C. Reilly
    Ophthalmology, US Air Force, Lackland AFB, Texas
  • T. Q. Dang
    Ophthalmology, US Air Force, Lackland AFB, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships M.E. McChesney, None; C. Reilly, None; T.Q. Dang, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5300. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. E. McChesney, C. Reilly, T. Q. Dang; VitagelTM vs. TisseelTM Tissue Adhesives in Ocular Surface Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5300.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose:: The use of tissue adhesives as adjunctives to ophthalmic surgery have been reported since 1968. This study looks at two fibrin based tissue adhesives with different sources of fibrinogen. TisseelTM (manufactured by Baxter) used pooled human fibrinogen, while VitagelTM (manufactured by Angiotech) uses autologous serum as the source of fibrinogen. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in the intra-operative and post-operative course of ocular surface surgery, specifically pterygium excision surgery when using either VitagelTM or TisseelTM. Specifically: is there a difference in operative time and presence of post operative pain? Is there a different rate of complications: to include graft dehiscence, infection or recurrence?

Methods:: A review of medical records at Wilford Hall Medical Center was undertaken to find patients who had undergone surgery to excise pterygiums. Records were included if either VitagelTM or TisseelTM were used as the tissue adhesive. Operative report and post operative clinical notes were reviewed and the following information was collected for each patient. Time of operation, tissue glue used, intra-operative complications, post op pain, infection, graft dehiscence, recurrence of pterygium at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post operatively. The data was then analyzed using simple student’s T-test to evaluate for statistically significant differences.

Results:: The average time of pterygium surgery for the TisseelTM group was 37 minutes, for the VitagelTM group, average time of 44 minutes, this was not found to be statistically significant (p: 0.28) There was no difference in the presence of post operative pain or infection. There was one case of graft dehiscence and one case of pterygium recurrence recorded among the patients that used Vitagel, however, this was not statistically significant (p=0.16).

Conclusions:: While there was a recorded episode of a conjunctival autograft dehiscence and a pterygium recurrence in the group of patients who used an autologous serum based tissue adhesives (VitagelTM), there was not a statistically significant difference in the operative time, post-operative pain, pterygium recurrence rate or graft dehiscence rate when comparing VitagelTM and TisseelTM tissue adhesives in ocular surface surgery. Familiarity with the proper preparation of each of the tissue adhesives by both the surgeon and the operating room staff is an important factor in the choice of a tissue adhesive for efficient and effective surgery.

Keywords: Pterygium • conjunctiva • cornea: clinical science 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.