May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
OCT Imaging of Glaucoma Drainage Implants in the Rabbit Model
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.C. Will, Jr.
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • S.R. Uhlhorn
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • W. Lee
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • A. Bernal
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
    Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL
  • M. Aly
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • E. Arrieta
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • F. Fantes
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • F. Manns
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
    Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL
  • C. Puliafito
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
  • J.–M. Parel
    Univ. of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute,
    CHU Sart–Tilman, Univ. of Liege, Liege, Belgium
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.C. Will, None; S.R. Uhlhorn, None; W. Lee, None; A. Bernal, None; M. Aly, None; E. Arrieta, None; F. Fantes, None; F. Manns, None; C. Puliafito, Carl Zeiss, Inc., F; Carl Zeiss, Inc., C; Carl Zeiss, Inc., P; J. Parel, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant P30–EY014801 NIH center grant P30–EY014801; InnFocus LLC, Miami FL; Florida Lions Eye Bank; Research to Prevent Blindness; Fight For Sight; the Henri and Flore Lesieur Foundation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 1328. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.C. Will, Jr., S.R. Uhlhorn, W. Lee, A. Bernal, M. Aly, E. Arrieta, F. Fantes, F. Manns, C. Puliafito, J.–M. Parel; OCT Imaging of Glaucoma Drainage Implants in the Rabbit Model . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):1328.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To image the position of draining tubes in the rabbit model using optical coherence tomography.

Methods: : A Stratus OCT–3 (Zeiss–Humphrey, CA) was modified with a custom–built adjustable stage and an animal carrier with 2 degree of rotation to allow examination of the angle structures of rabbits. 5 NWZ rabbit eyes implanted with silicone rubber (polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS, Dow Corning, Midland MI) drainage tubes (outer diameter = 0.64mm, lumen=0.3mm) or SIBS [poly(styrene–b–isobutylene–b–styrene), MiDi, InnFocus LLC, Miami FL], drainage tubes (outer diameter = 0.25mm, lumen = 0.07mm) were scanned. In order to visualize the implant, the animals were anesthetized and the OCT objective adjusted to its maximum forward setting to focus the OCT beam on the surface of the eye. No optical modification was required to acquire images.

Results: : The tube position and its relationship with the corneal vault, limbus and iris plane could be scanned and measured in all eyes. Cysts under the conjunctiva–Tenon surface that were difficult to visualize with the slit–lamp were recorded with OCT. In all animals, OCT was able to detect the presence of shallow blebs which could not be identified with the slit–lamp. With OCT we were able to check the patency of PMDS tube’s lumen even when buried beneath conjunctiva–Tenon tissues. Incorrect positioning of the tube distal end was observed in one animal, and thinning of the conjunctival–Tenon tissues overlaying the implant in another animal. OCT could not detect thin fibrin bridges linking the iris to the implant at the angle that could be seen with the slit–lamp at 40x.

Conclusions: : Optical coherence tomography is a useful tool for the follow–up of animal models implanted with glaucoma drainage implants.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×