May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Visual Rehabilitation in Combined Cataract Extraction, IOL Placement, and Corneal Transplant, Phaco vs. ECCE
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.H. Chang
    Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • G.W. Zaidman
    Ophthalmology, New York Medical College/Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
  • D. Khoramian
    Ophthalmology, Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.H. Chang, None; G.W. Zaidman, None; D. Khoramian, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 2373. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.H. Chang, G.W. Zaidman, D. Khoramian; Visual Rehabilitation in Combined Cataract Extraction, IOL Placement, and Corneal Transplant, Phaco vs. ECCE . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):2373.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To investigate the rapidity of visual rehabilitation in patients who had a combined cataract extraction with implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) and corneal transplant using either the phacoemulsification (PHACOPKP) or extracapsular (ECCEPKP) method.

Methods: : A retrospective chart review of cases from one surgeon performed from 2000–2005 identified 62 eyes; 29 with PHACOPKP and 33 with ECCEPKP. Traditional ECCEPKP was done from 2000–2003 and the PHACOPKP method was used since then. Eyes with severe retinal or optic nerve disease were excluded. In the ECCEPKP method the host cornea was removed followed by an open–sky cataract extraction and non–foldable IOL insertion. After this, implantation of the donor cornea was performed. In the PHACOPKP method, the cataract extraction and foldable IOL insertion was performed under a closed system followed by corneal transplantation. We measured the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using either pinhole or refraction at 1, 2, 4, and 6 months.

Results: : In the PHACOPKP group, we found 21 patients to have Fuchs dystrophy or corneal edema, 4 with corneal scars, and 4 with other diagnoses. In the ECCEPKP group, 20 patients had Fuchs or edema, 7 had scars, and 6 had other diagnoses. In the PHACOPKP group, 1 month postoperative, 40% of eyes had BCVA <20/200, 28% were 20/60–20/100, and 31% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/100. At 2 months, 14% had BCVA <20/200, 46% were 20/60–20/100, and 39% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/70. At 4 months, 7% had BCVA <20/200, 32% were 20/60–20/100, and 61% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/50. 6 month results were similar with a median vision of 20/40. In the ECCEPKP group, 1 month postoperative, 82% of eyes had BCVA <20/200, 15% were 20/60–20/100, and 3% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/300. At 2 months, 43% had BCVA <20/200, 40% were 20/60–20/100, and 16% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/100. At 4 months, 23% had BCVA <20/200, 42% were 20/60–20/100, and 35% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/60. At 6 months, 6% had BCVA <20/200, 29% were 20/60–20/100, and 65% were >20/50. Median vision was 20/50.

Conclusions: : Patients undergoing combined cataract extraction with IOL and corneal transplant had a faster visual recovery with the PHACOPKP method vs. the ECCEPKP method. Therefore we suggest PHACOPKP should be the preferred method in those patients where the cornea is clear enough to perform the procedure.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • cataract • intraocular lens 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.