May 2006
Volume 47, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2006
Rainbow Glare as Optical Side Effect of IntraLASIK
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R.R. Krueger
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • I.L. Thornton
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
    Univ of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham,, AL
  • T.J. van den Berg
    Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute, The Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.R. Krueger, IntraLase, F; IntraLase, R; I.L. Thornton, None; T.J. van den Berg, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2006, Vol.47, 4330. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R.R. Krueger, I.L. Thornton, T.J. van den Berg; Rainbow Glare as Optical Side Effect of IntraLASIK . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(13):4330.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To report on a new optical side effect associated with the IntraLASIK procedure.

Methods: : A retrospective review was performed on 571 eyes of 301 patients treated with IntraLASIK over a period from June 2004 to August 2005. The eyes are divided into two groups: Group I represents 403 eyes (215 patients) treated with the IntraLase I laser at a spot separation of 9 to 11 um, line separation of 9 um and raster energies varying from 1.3 –2.6 uJ. Group II represent 168 eyes (86 patients) treated with the IntraLase II laser at a spot and line separation of 9 to 10 um and raster energy of 1.3 uJ. Pre and post–op refraction, pupillometry, pachymetry, visual acuity, wavefront aberrations, and report of symptoms were recorded. The spatial extent of the rainbow spectral pattern was drawn for calculation of the size of the grating pattern causing the light scatter.

Results: : In Group I, 164 of the 215 patients (76.3%) were successfully contacted to specifically ask whether they experienced symptoms of halos or starburst at night and/or rainbow colors around lights. 31 patients in 58 eyes reported symptoms of spectral starburst around lights (rainbow glare) for an incidence of 18.9%. In Group II, 0 patients reported similar symptoms. The spectral pattern most closely represented 6–12 radiating lines of rainbow colored light, which was noted immediately after surgery and in some eyes diminished over time. The spatial extent of the color pattern ranged from 2.5 to 4.5 degrees of visual angle around point light sources (ie. radiating bands extending ∼25mm (blue) to ∼34mm (yellow) to ∼40 mm (red) around a centrally placed light, when drawn on paper held ∼55 cm from the patient’s eye). This could be calculated using grating formulas to correspond to a ∼9 um sized periodicity pattern within the corneal interface.

Conclusions: : Light scattering from the back surface of the IntraLASIK flap causes a constructive interference, creating a spectral pattern in a significant percentage (∼20%) of Group I eyes. The angular extent of the color pattern can be calculated to correspond to a grating size that matches the approximate raster spot separation and pattern of IntraLase pulsing. The spectral pattern was not observed in Group II eyes where a tighter focus minimizes the light scattering phenomenon. Variance in the quality of focusing optics impacts the precision of spot placement and interface uniformity in IntraLase flap creation, which when optimized eliminates the possibility of rainbow glare as an optical side effect.

Keywords: refractive surgery: optical quality • refractive surgery: complications • refractive surgery: LASIK 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.